Asai T, Koga K, Jones R M, Stacey M, Latto I P, Vaughan R S
Department of Anaesthesiology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.
Anaesthesia. 1998 Aug;53(8):817-22. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00524.x.
We studied the efficacy of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway in 100 patients. Insertion of the airway after induction of anaesthesia with propofol was easy in 95 of 100 patients, moderately difficult in four patients and failed in one patient. Complications, such as coughing, gagging or body movement, occurred during induction and insertion in 15 patients. Insertion of the airway was not associated with tachycardia or hypertension. Manual ventilation through the airway was easy in less than 30% of patients immediately after insertion. Manual ventilation became easier after adjusting the position of the patient's head, neck or jaw. During spontaneous breathing, adjustment of the head, neck or jaw was required in 30% of patients. Complete airway obstruction occurred in one patient after insertion of the device and in two patients during maintenance of anaesthesia. The airway was left in place during emergence from anaesthesia in the remaining 97 patients. No complications occurred in 91 patients and coughing occurred in the remaining six patients before or during removal of the airway. No regurgitation, vomiting or laryngospasm occurred in any patient at any time. Therefore, the cuffed oropharyngeal airway has a potential use in anaesthetised patients who are breathing spontaneously.
我们研究了带套囊口咽通气道在100例患者中的有效性。在100例患者中,95例在使用丙泊酚诱导麻醉后插入通气道很容易,4例中度困难,1例失败。15例患者在诱导和插入过程中出现咳嗽、恶心或身体移动等并发症。插入通气道与心动过速或高血压无关。插入后立即通过通气道进行手动通气在不到30%的患者中很容易。调整患者头部、颈部或下颌位置后,手动通气变得更容易。在自主呼吸期间,30%的患者需要调整头部、颈部或下颌。1例患者在插入装置后出现完全气道梗阻,2例患者在麻醉维持期间出现完全气道梗阻。其余97例患者在麻醉苏醒期保留通气道。91例患者未出现并发症,其余6例患者在拔除通气道之前或期间出现咳嗽。任何患者在任何时候均未发生反流、呕吐或喉痉挛。因此,带套囊口咽通气道在自主呼吸的麻醉患者中有潜在用途。