Takada M, Wu C Y, Lang T F, Genant H K
Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0628, USA.
Osteoporos Int. 1998;8(3):197-203. doi: 10.1007/s001980050054.
Semiquantitative vertebral fracture assessment was compared between lateral computed tomography (CT) scoutviews and conventional thoracolumbar spinal radiographs. Vertebral levels T4-L4 were assessed by both techniques in a group of 56 women (mean age 60 +/- 13 years). In order to compare inter- and intra-observer variabilities for the two techniques, the images were analyzed twice by two independent observers, and percentage agreement and kappa statistics were measured both between readings and between observers. Percentage agreement and kappa statistics were also used to quantify differences between techniques. In the CT scoutviews, noise and artifacts from overlying tissues in the thoracic spinal levels rendered 3.4% of the vertebrae unreadable for the first observer and 8.3% for the second observer. For the CT scoutviews the agreement between readings was 98.1%, 97.3% and 100% (kappa = 0.87, 0.83 and 1.0) on T4-L12, T4-12 and L1-4, respectively for the first observer, and 97.8%, 97.1% and 99.5% (kappa = 0.79, 0.73 and 0.92) for the second observer. For the lateral radiographs, the agreement between readings was 97.7%, 96.9% and 100% (kappa = 0.87, 0.85 and 1.0) on T4-L12, T4-12 and L1-4, respectively for the first observer, and 98.4%, 97.7% and 99.5% (kappa = 0.86, 0.82 and 0.95) for the second observer. The agreement between observers was 96.1%, 94.4% and 100% (kappa = 0.68, 0.58 and 1.0) on T4-L12, T4-12 and L1-4, respectively for the CT scoutviews and 96.8%, 95.9% and 99.0% (kappa = 0.79, 0.76 and 0.91) for the lateral radiographs. The inter-technique was 95.8%, 94.2% and 99.5% (kappa = 0.73, 0.68 and 0.95) on T4-L12, T4-12 and L1-4, respectively for the first observer and 95.6%, 94.2% and 99.0% (kappa = 0.64, 0.55 and 0.90) for the second observer, with the scoutview technique detecting, on average, 23% fewer fractures than the lateral radiographs. Although the vertebral fracture detection in lumbar spine is quite comparable to that of conventional radiographs, given its reduced sensitivity for vertebral fracture detection in thoracic spine, the lateral CT scoutview technique should not be substituted for conventional radiographs where diagnosis of all vertebral fractures is of primary importance.
对56名女性(平均年龄60±13岁)进行研究,比较了侧位计算机断层扫描(CT)定位像与传统胸腰椎X线片的半定量椎体骨折评估。两种技术均对T4-L4椎体水平进行评估。为比较两种技术在观察者间和观察者内的变异性,由两名独立观察者对图像进行两次分析,并测量读数间以及观察者间的百分比一致性和kappa统计量。百分比一致性和kappa统计量也用于量化技术之间的差异。在CT定位像中,胸段椎体水平上覆组织的噪声和伪影导致第一位观察者有3.4%的椎体无法读取,第二位观察者有8.3%的椎体无法读取。对于CT定位像,第一位观察者在T4-L12、T4-12和L1-4上读数间的一致性分别为98.1%、97.3%和100%(kappa = 0.87、0.83和1.0),第二位观察者分别为97.8%、97.1%和99.5%(kappa = 0.79、0.73和0.92)。对于侧位X线片,第一位观察者在T4-L12、T4-12和L1-4上读数间的一致性分别为97.7%、96.9%和100%(kappa = 0.87、0.85和1.0),第二位观察者分别为98.4%、97.7%和99.5%(kappa = 0.86、0.82和0.95)。对于CT定位像,观察者间在T4-L12、T4-12和L1-4上的一致性分别为96.1%、94.4%和100%(kappa = 0.68、0.58和1.0),对于侧位X线片分别为96.8%、95.9%和99.0%(kappa = 0.79、0.76和0.91)。对于第一位观察者,两种技术在T4-L12、T4-12和L1-4上的一致性分别为95.8%、94.2%和99.5%(kappa = 0.73、0.68和0.95),对于第二位观察者分别为95.6%、94.2%和99.0%(kappa = 0.64、0.55和0.90),CT定位像技术检测到的骨折平均比侧位X线片少23%。尽管腰椎椎体骨折的检测与传统X线片相当,但鉴于其对胸椎椎体骨折检测的敏感性降低,在所有椎体骨折诊断至关重要的情况下,侧位CT定位像技术不应替代传统X线片。