Nordahl J, Andersson G, Reinholt F P
Department of Immunology, Microbiology, Pathology and Infectious Diseases, Division of Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge Hospital, S-141 86 Huddinge, Sweden.
Calcif Tissue Int. 1998 Nov;63(5):401-8. doi: 10.1007/s002239900548.
The aim of the present study was to characterize cells involved in resorption during endochondral bone formation. We investigated whether the cells involved in cartilage breakdown at the epiphyseal/metaphyseal border, i.e., chondroclasts, share the characteristics of bone/cartilage-resorbing osteoclasts at the metaphyseal/diaphyseal border regarding ultrastructural features and functional activity. Morphometric evaluation showed that chondroclasts do not form ruffled borders and clear zones, i.e., well-known resorption characteristics, to the same extent as osteoclasts, present at the lower metaphysis. Instead, chondroclasts tend to express an undifferentiated surface adjacent to the matrix, not structurally different from the basolateral plasma membrane. Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) was used as a marker for functional activity. Immunohistochemical staining by light microscopy was strong in both chondroclasts and in osteoclasts. Furthermore, in situ hybridization revealed large amounts of TRAP mRNA in chondroclasts as well as in osteoclasts. Ultrastructural immunohistochemistry suggests extensive secretion of the TRAP enzyme in the ruffled border area of both chondroclasts and osteoclasts. Intracellular accumulation was seen particularly in chondroclasts, possibly as a consequence of a relative disinclination to develop a ruffled border. Thus, semiquantitative estimation of TRAP distribution showed an inverse relationship between extracellular and intracellular TRAP in chondroclasts and osteoclasts. These results indicate that chondroclasts and osteoclasts differ, not only with respect to location but possibly also by mode of action. The observed differences may reflect the maturation sequence of these multinucleated cells when associated with different metaphyseal trabecular surfaces.
本研究的目的是描述软骨内骨形成过程中参与吸收的细胞特征。我们研究了在骨骺/干骺端边界参与软骨分解的细胞,即破软骨细胞,在超微结构特征和功能活性方面是否与干骺端/骨干边界处参与骨/软骨吸收的破骨细胞具有相同特征。形态计量学评估显示,破软骨细胞形成的皱褶缘和清亮区,即众所周知的吸收特征,程度不及干骺端下部的破骨细胞。相反,破软骨细胞倾向于在与基质相邻处表达未分化的表面,在结构上与基底外侧质膜无异。抗酒石酸酸性磷酸酶(TRAP)被用作功能活性的标志物。光学显微镜下的免疫组织化学染色在破软骨细胞和破骨细胞中均呈强阳性。此外,原位杂交显示破软骨细胞和破骨细胞中均有大量TRAP mRNA。超微结构免疫组织化学表明,TRAP酶在破软骨细胞和破骨细胞的皱褶缘区域均有大量分泌。细胞内积聚尤其在破软骨细胞中可见,这可能是由于相对不愿意形成皱褶缘的结果。因此,TRAP分布的半定量估计显示,破软骨细胞和破骨细胞中细胞外和细胞内TRAP呈负相关。这些结果表明,破软骨细胞和破骨细胞不仅在位置上不同,而且在作用方式上可能也不同。观察到的差异可能反映了这些多核细胞与不同干骺端小梁表面相关时的成熟顺序。