• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Probabilistic reasoning in the law. Part 2: Assessment of probabilities and explanation of the value of trace evidence other than DNA.

作者信息

Taroni F, Aitken C G

机构信息

Dept. of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Sci Justice. 1998 Jul-Sep;38(3):179-88. doi: 10.1016/S1355-0306(98)72102-1.

DOI:10.1016/S1355-0306(98)72102-1
PMID:9800433
Abstract

Problems associated with the interpretation of scientific evidence (fibres and glass) in forensic science are investigated with reference to measures of uncertainty associated with the presentation of such evidence in an adversarial context. The investigation includes the use of probabilistic arguments associated with expert scientific testimony in the courts. Cases where scientific evidence has been presented in court are studied. A series of problems were developed for, and given to, forensic medicine students' forensic science students and practitioners (advocates and forensic scientists) in Scotland to investigate their understanding of uncertainty.

摘要

相似文献

1
Probabilistic reasoning in the law. Part 2: Assessment of probabilities and explanation of the value of trace evidence other than DNA.
Sci Justice. 1998 Jul-Sep;38(3):179-88. doi: 10.1016/S1355-0306(98)72102-1.
2
Probabilistic reasoning in the law. Part 1: Assessment of probabilities and explanation of the value of DNA evidence.
Sci Justice. 1998 Jul-Sep;38(3):165-77. doi: 10.1016/S1355-0306(98)72101-X.
3
The likelihood approach to compare populations: a study on DNA evidence and pitfalls of intuitions.比较群体的似然性方法:关于DNA证据及直觉陷阱的研究
Sci Justice. 1999 Oct-Dec;39(4):213-22. doi: 10.1016/S1355-0306(99)72052-6.
4
The relevance of the evolution of experimental studies for the interpretation and evaluation of some trace physical evidence.
Sci Justice. 2009 Dec;49(4):277-85. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2009.02.004.
5
[Achievements of the Cracow School of Forensic Medicine--on the 200 the anniversary of the Chair of Forensic Medicine--Part I].[克拉科夫法医学派的成就——法医学系成立200周年之际——第一部分]
Przegl Lek. 2006;63(12):1326-30.
6
Evaluation and presentation of forensic DNA evidence in European laboratories.欧洲实验室中法医DNA证据的评估与呈现。
Sci Justice. 2002 Jan-Mar;42(1):21-8. doi: 10.1016/S1355-0306(02)71793-0.
7
Equal prior probabilities: can one do any better?相等的先验概率:还能做得更好吗?
Forensic Sci Int. 2007 Oct 25;172(2-3):85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.12.008. Epub 2007 Jan 30.
8
Decision theoretic properties of forensic identification: underlying logic and argumentative implications.法医鉴定的决策理论属性:潜在逻辑与论证含义。
Forensic Sci Int. 2008 May 20;177(2-3):120-32. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.11.008. Epub 2008 Jan 9.
9
DNA evidence, probabilistic evaluation and collaborative tests.
Forensic Sci Int. 2000 Feb 14;108(2):121-43. doi: 10.1016/s0379-0738(99)00197-8.
10
Bayesian networks for evaluating forensic DNA profiling evidence: a review and guide to literature.贝叶斯网络在法医 DNA 分析证据评估中的应用:文献综述与指南。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2012 Mar;6(2):147-57. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.06.009. Epub 2011 Jul 19.