Dawson G A, Lindblom B S
Centre of Forensic Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sci Justice. 1998 Jul-Sep;38(3):189-94. doi: 10.1016/S1355-0306(98)72103-3.
Qualified forensic document examiners from Canada, USA, Great Britain and Australia participated in this study. They were sent one photocopied signature, together with a set of original known standards to evaluate the line quality of the photocopied signature and compare these characteristics with the standards. They were asked to assess the photocopies for the presence of tremor, hesitation, pen lifts, patching, blunt initial or terminal strokes, and abrupt changes in direction. The authors compared the assessments with the corresponding original signatures. It was possible to determine which line quality characteristics were the most difficult to detect, which indicia of simulation were concealed and what anomalies were introduced by the photocopying process. Results indicated that line quality characteristics can be identified in average quality photocopies. Furthermore, accurate judgements can be made regarding similarities and differences in line quality when comparing a photocopied signature with original known standards. In a few instances, ink line morphology was problematic when striation patterns and ink gooping were misinterpreted as pen lifts, hesitation and patching on the photocopies.
来自加拿大、美国、英国和澳大利亚的合格法医文件检验员参与了这项研究。他们收到一份签名复印件以及一套已知的原始标准样本,用于评估签名复印件的线条质量,并将这些特征与标准样本进行比较。他们被要求评估复印件上是否存在震颤、停顿、提笔、修补、笔画起笔或收笔钝圆以及方向突变等情况。作者将评估结果与相应的原始签名进行了比较。由此可以确定哪些线条质量特征最难检测、哪些模拟迹象被隐藏以及复印过程引入了哪些异常。结果表明,在质量一般的复印件中可以识别线条质量特征。此外,在将签名复印件与已知原始标准样本进行比较时,可以对线条质量的异同做出准确判断。在少数情况下,当复印件上的条纹图案和油墨堆积被误判为提笔、停顿和修补时,油墨线条形态会出现问题。