Suppr超能文献

对勒贝克的回应或律师面对哲学一致性时的本体论谦逊。

Reply to Lebech or the ontological humility of the lawyer faced with philosophical consistency.

作者信息

Byk J C

机构信息

University of Poitiers, France.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 1998 Oct;24(5):348-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.24.5.348.

Abstract

Replying to the criticisms of Lebech, the author tries, regarding the issue of embryo research, to draw a line between what could be an international legal approach and what is a philosophical ontological quest. It is then up to the reader to decide if, and how far, these two different approaches can be complementary.

摘要

针对勒贝希的批评,作者试图在胚胎研究问题上,划分出国际法律途径与哲学本体论探索之间的界限。接下来就由读者来决定这两种不同的途径是否能够互补以及在多大程度上互补。

相似文献

6
Regulation of experimentation on the unborn.对未出生胎儿进行实验的监管。
J Leg Med. 1993 Mar;14(1):25-56. doi: 10.1080/01947649309510902.
8
Lifchez v. Hartigan.利夫切斯诉哈蒂根案
Fed Suppl. 1990 Apr 26;735:1361-77.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验