Madiba T E, Mars M, Robbs J V
Department of Surgery, University of Natal, Durban, South Africa.
J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1998 Oct;43(5):310-3.
Of a total of 492 patients (984 limbs) undergoing aortobifemoral bypass for aorto-iliac disease, 123 limbs with occlusion of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) were compared with 861 limbs with a patent SFA, and were prospectively monitored to assess the efficacy of the profunda femoris artery (PFA) as sole 'runoff' of this operation. There were more late occlusions in the limbs with occluded SFA (15%) compared to those with a patent SFA to begin with (7%). The five-year patency rate was 87% for limbs with patent SFA and 80% for limbs with occluded SFA. Claudicants had a higher 5-year patency rate compared to threatened limbs irrespective of runoff. We conclude that profunda femoris can be used as sole runoff although the rate of occlusion tends to be higher in this group compared with counterparts with patent SFA.
在总共492例(984条肢体)因主-髂动脉疾病接受主-双股动脉旁路移植术的患者中,将123条股浅动脉(SFA)闭塞的肢体与861条SFA通畅的肢体进行比较,并对其进行前瞻性监测,以评估股深动脉(PFA)作为该手术唯一“流出道”的疗效。与一开始SFA通畅的肢体(7%)相比,SFA闭塞的肢体出现更多的晚期闭塞(15%)。SFA通畅的肢体五年通畅率为87%,SFA闭塞的肢体为80%。无论流出道情况如何,间歇性跛行患者的5年通畅率高于有肢体缺血危险的患者。我们得出结论,股深动脉可作为唯一的流出道,尽管与SFA通畅的对应肢体相比,该组的闭塞率往往更高。