• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

视觉-听觉刺激的分离程度及眼位对视觉与听觉空间交互作用的影响。

Effect of degree of separation of visual-auditory stimulus and eye position upon spatial interaction of vision and audition.

作者信息

Bermant R I, Welch R B

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 1976 Oct;42(43):487-93. doi: 10.2466/pms.1976.42.2.487.

DOI:10.2466/pms.1976.42.2.487
PMID:980644
Abstract

Subjects were exposed to a visual and to an auditory stimulus that differed spatially in laterality of origin. The subjects were observed for visual biasing of auditory localization (the momentary influence of a light on the spatially perceived location of a simultaneously presented sound) and for auditory aftereffect (a change in perceived location of a sound that persists over time and is measured after termination of the visual stimulus). A significant effect of visual stimulation on auditory localization was found only with the measure of bias. Bias was tested as a function of degree of visual-auditory separation (10/20/30 degrees), eye position (straight-ahead/visual stimulus fixation), and position of visual stimulus relative to auditory stimulus (left/right). Only eye position proved statistically significant; straight-ahead eye position induced more bias than did fixation of the visual stimulus.

摘要

受试者暴露于视觉和听觉刺激下,这两种刺激在起源的空间侧向性上有所不同。观察受试者的听觉定位视觉偏向(光线对同时呈现声音的空间感知位置的瞬时影响)和听觉后效(声音感知位置随时间持续的变化,并在视觉刺激终止后进行测量)。仅在偏向测量中发现视觉刺激对听觉定位有显著影响。偏向作为视觉 - 听觉分离程度(10/20/30度)、眼睛位置(直视/视觉刺激注视)以及视觉刺激相对于听觉刺激的位置(左/右)的函数进行测试。只有眼睛位置在统计学上具有显著意义;直视眼睛位置比视觉刺激注视引起更多的偏向。

相似文献

1
Effect of degree of separation of visual-auditory stimulus and eye position upon spatial interaction of vision and audition.视觉-听觉刺激的分离程度及眼位对视觉与听觉空间交互作用的影响。
Percept Mot Skills. 1976 Oct;42(43):487-93. doi: 10.2466/pms.1976.42.2.487.
2
Retinotopic effects during spatial audio-visual integration.空间视听整合过程中的视网膜拓扑效应。
Neuropsychologia. 2007 Feb 1;45(3):531-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.05.018. Epub 2006 Jun 23.
3
Rightward shift of the auditory subjective straight ahead in right- and left-handed subjects.
Neuropsychologia. 2007 Jan 28;45(2):447-53. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.05.027. Epub 2006 Aug 1.
4
Visual localization of sounds.声音的视觉定位
Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(11):1655-61. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.01.015. Epub 2005 Mar 2.
5
Eye-position effects in directional hearing.定向听力中的眼位效应。
Behav Brain Res. 1997 Aug;87(1):35-48. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(96)02254-1.
6
Is there a role of visual cortex in spatial hearing?视觉皮层在空间听觉中起作用吗?
Eur J Neurosci. 2004 Dec;20(11):3148-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03766.x.
7
Visual localization ability influences cross-modal bias.视觉定位能力影响跨模态偏差。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Jan 1;15(1):20-9. doi: 10.1162/089892903321107792.
8
Auditory-visual coordination in neonates.新生儿的视听协调
Child Dev. 1977 Mar;48(1):138-43.
9
Eye position and visual attention influence perceived auditory direction.眼睛位置和视觉注意力会影响听觉方向感知。
Percept Mot Skills. 1984 Oct;59(2):483-510. doi: 10.2466/pms.1984.59.2.483.
10
Auditory spatial perception dynamically realigns with changing eye position.听觉空间感知会随着眼睛位置的变化而动态重新调整。
J Neurosci. 2007 Sep 19;27(38):10249-58. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0938-07.2007.

引用本文的文献

1
Electro-haptic stimulation enhances speech recognition in spatially separated noise for cochlear implant users.电触觉刺激可提高人工耳蜗使用者在空间分离噪声中的言语识别能力。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 29;10(1):12723. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69697-2.
2
Modality-specific attention attenuates visual-tactile integration and recalibration effects by reducing prior expectations of a common source for vision and touch.特定模态注意力通过降低对视觉和触觉共同来源的先验期望,减弱了视觉-触觉整合及重新校准效应。
Cognition. 2020 Apr;197:104170. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104170. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
3
Cross-modal perceptual load: the impact of modality and individual differences.
跨模态感知负荷:模态及个体差异的影响
Exp Brain Res. 2016 May;234(5):1279-91. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4517-0. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
4
Auditory scene analysis and sonified visual images. Does consonance negatively impact on object formation when using complex sonified stimuli?听觉场景分析与可听化视觉图像。使用复杂的可听化刺激时,和谐音是否会对物体形成产生负面影响?
Front Psychol. 2015 Oct 13;6:1522. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01522. eCollection 2015.
5
Synchronization with competing visual and auditory rhythms: bouncing ball meets metronome.与竞争的视觉和听觉节奏同步:弹球与节拍器相遇。
Psychol Res. 2013 Jul;77(4):388-98. doi: 10.1007/s00426-012-0441-0. Epub 2012 May 26.
6
Auditory temporal modulation of the visual Ternus effect: the influence of time interval.听觉对视觉 Ternus 效应的时变调制:时间间隔的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2010 Jun;203(4):723-35. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2286-3. Epub 2010 May 16.
7
The dog's meow: asymmetrical interaction in cross-modal object recognition.狗的喵叫:跨模态物体识别中的不对称交互。
Exp Brain Res. 2009 Mar;193(4):603-14. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1664-6. Epub 2008 Dec 6.
8
Multisensory integration in the superior colliculus: a neural network model.上丘中的多感官整合:一种神经网络模型。
J Comput Neurosci. 2009 Feb;26(1):55-73. doi: 10.1007/s10827-008-0096-4. Epub 2008 May 14.
9
Temporal constraints on interactions across kinaesthetic channels.
Exp Brain Res. 2005 Aug;164(4):529-40. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-2273-2. Epub 2005 Apr 16.
10
Feeling what you hear: auditory signals can modulate tactile tap perception.感受所听之物:听觉信号可调节触觉敲击感知。
Exp Brain Res. 2005 Apr;162(2):172-80. doi: 10.1007/s00221-004-2128-2. Epub 2004 Dec 10.