Martínez-Monge R, Nag S, Martin E W
Division of Radiation Oncology, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and The Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210, USA.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Oct 1;42(3):545-50. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00269-7.
To evaluate the results of 125I brachytherapy in colorectal cancers recurrent in the pelvis and paraortics.
From September 1989 to January 1997, 29 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma recurrent in the pelvis or the paraortic nodes were treated intraoperatively with permanent 125iodine seed implantation at the James Cancer Center of The Ohio State University (OSU). All patients had undergone prior surgery; 72% had prior EBRT. The implanted residual tumor volume was microscopic in 38% and gross in 62%. The implanted area (median 25 cc) received a median minimal peripheral dose of 140 Gy to total decay. An omental pedicle was used to minimize irradiation of the bowel. Five patients received additional postimplant EBRT (20-50 Gy; median 30 Gy).
The 1-, 2-, and 4-year actuarial local-regional control rates were 38%, 17%, and 17%, respectively, with a median time to local failure of 11 months (95% CI 10-12 months). The first manifestation of disease progression in 52 % of the patients was local-regional. In addition, 22 patients (75%) developed distant metastases. The 1-, 2-, and 4-year actuarial overall survival rates were 70%, 35%, and 21%, (median = 18 months; 95% CI: 14-22 months). Overall survival was better for patients smaller volume implants (p = 0.007), with a lower total activity implanted (p = 0.0003), with a smaller number of implanted sites (p = 0.004), and with microscopic residual disease (p = 0.01). Patients receiving additional EBRT also had a better prognosis (p = 0.005). Local tumor progression was the cause of death in 34% of the patients who have died at the time of this report and 56% died of distant metastases. Of the patients, 13 (45%) experienced 15 toxic events, including 3 patients (10%) with enteric fistula. Neuropathy was not observed.
125I brachytherapy can be successfully used for salvage in patients with recurrent colorectal cancer. Patients with isolated, microscopic, or minimal gross residual disease requiring small-volume implants and those receiving additional EBRT have a better prognosis. Postimplant EBRT is now routinely added, even for previously irradiated patients, in an attempt to improve local control. Compared to IOERT and IOHDR, 125I brachytherapy is not associated with clinical neuropathy, probably due to the continuous low dose rate irradiation delivered by the 125I seeds.
评估¹²⁵I近距离放射治疗盆腔和腹主动脉旁复发性结直肠癌的效果。
1989年9月至1997年1月,俄亥俄州立大学(OSU)詹姆斯癌症中心对29例盆腔或腹主动脉旁淋巴结复发的结肠腺癌患者进行了术中¹²⁵碘籽源永久性植入治疗。所有患者均接受过先前手术;72%接受过先前的外照射放疗(EBRT)。植入时残留肿瘤体积微小的占38%,肉眼可见的占62%。植入区域(中位体积25立方厘米)接受的中位最小周边剂量至总衰变时为140Gy。采用网膜蒂以减少肠道受照。5例患者接受了植入后额外的EBRT(20 - 50Gy;中位剂量30Gy)。
1年、2年和4年的精算局部区域控制率分别为38%、17%和17%,局部失败的中位时间为11个月(95%置信区间10 - 12个月)。52%的患者疾病进展的首发表现为局部区域复发。此外,22例患者(75%)发生远处转移。1年、2年和4年的精算总生存率分别为70%、35%和21%(中位生存时间 = 18个月;95%置信区间:14 - 22个月)。植入体积较小(p = 0.007)、植入总活度较低(p = 0.0003)、植入部位较少(p = 0.004)以及残留疾病为微小病变(p = 0.01)的患者总生存情况较好。接受额外EBRT的患者预后也较好(p = 0.005)。在本报告时已死亡的患者中,34%死于局部肿瘤进展,56%死于远处转移。13例患者(45%)发生了15次毒性事件,包括3例患者(10%)发生肠瘘。未观察到神经病变。
¹²⁵I近距离放射治疗可成功用于复发性结直肠癌患者的挽救治疗。孤立性、微小或微小肉眼残留疾病且需要小体积植入的患者以及接受额外EBRT的患者预后较好。现在即使是先前接受过放疗的患者,植入后也常规加用EBRT,以试图改善局部控制。与术中电子线放射治疗(IOERT)和高剂量率近距离放射治疗(IOHDR)相比,¹²⁵I近距离放射治疗与临床神经病变无关,可能是由于¹²⁵I籽源持续低剂量率照射的缘故。