Morgan M J, Ward R M, Brussell E M
Perception. 1976;5(3):309-17. doi: 10.1068/p050309.
When observers tracked moving stripes across a background either of stationary stripes, or of stripes moving in the opposite direction, they saw a clear motion aftereffect when the stripes stopped moving. The direction of this aftereffect was opposite to that of the previously tracked stripes, and was thus the same as the direction of the retinal movement of the non-tracked stripes. This aftereffect of tracking was shown not to depend upon slippage of the tracked contours on the retina during tracking, or upon the saccadic phase of optokinetic nystagmus. The effect showed storage over a period of time with the eyes shut. It appears that the effect is due to induced movement, and arises originally from stimulation of the retina by background contours in the tracking phase. This was shown by confining the view of the moving target to one eye, while permitting both eyes to be exposed to background stimulation during tracking. After such stimulation the magnitude of the aftereffect was equal in the two eyes.
当观察者在静止条纹背景或向相反方向移动的条纹背景上追踪移动的条纹时,当条纹停止移动时,他们会看到明显的运动后效。这种后效的方向与先前追踪的条纹方向相反,因此与未追踪条纹的视网膜运动方向相同。结果表明,这种追踪后效并不取决于追踪过程中被追踪轮廓在视网膜上的滑动,也不取决于视动性眼球震颤的扫视阶段。该效应在闭眼一段时间后仍会留存。似乎这种效应是由诱导运动引起的,最初源于追踪阶段背景轮廓对视网膜的刺激。这一点通过将移动目标的视野限制在一只眼睛上得以证明,同时在追踪过程中允许两只眼睛都受到背景刺激。经过这种刺激后,两只眼睛的后效大小相等。