• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颅内血管狭窄与闭塞:三维时间飞跃法与三维相位对比磁共振血管造影的比较

Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: comparison of 3D time-of-flight and 3D phase-contrast MR angiography.

作者信息

Oelerich M, Lentschig M G, Zunker P, Reimer P, Rummeny E J, Schuierer G

机构信息

Institute of Clinical Radiology, University of Münster, Germany.

出版信息

Neuroradiology. 1998 Sep;40(9):567-73. doi: 10.1007/s002340050645.

DOI:10.1007/s002340050645
PMID:9808312
Abstract

We compared the value of 3D time-of-flight (TOF) and phase-contrast (PC) MR angiography (MRA) for detection and grading of intracranial vascular steno-occlusive disease. Unenhanced 3D-TOF MRA and 3D-PC MRA (30-60 cm/s velocity encoding) were performed at the level of the circle of Willis in 18 patients, mean age 56 +/- 10 years. Postprocessed images using a maximum-intensity projection reconstruction with multiple targetted projections were analysed. A total of 126 vessels was assessed by PC MRA and 143 by TOF MRA, with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in 15 patients and/or transcranial Doppler sonography (TCD) in 18 as a standard. Two blinded readers reviewed the MRA, DSA and TCD examinations retrospectively. On DSA and/or TCD the two observers found 32 and 28 steno-occlusive lesions. 3D-TOF MRA was more sensitive than 3D-PC MRA (87% and 86% vs. 65% and 60%) and had a higher negative predictive value (96% vs. 89%). Correct grading of stenoses was achieved in 78 % by 3D-TOF and 65% by 3D-PC MRA.

摘要

我们比较了三维时间飞跃(TOF)和相位对比(PC)磁共振血管造影(MRA)在检测颅内血管狭窄闭塞性疾病及对其进行分级方面的价值。对18例平均年龄为56±10岁的患者在 Willis 环水平进行了非增强三维TOF MRA和三维PC MRA(速度编码为30 - 60 cm/s)检查。使用具有多个靶向投影的最大强度投影重建对后处理图像进行分析。通过PC MRA评估了总共126条血管,通过TOF MRA评估了143条血管,以15例患者的数字减影血管造影(DSA)和/或18例患者的经颅多普勒超声(TCD)作为标准。两位盲法阅片者对MRA、DSA和TCD检查进行了回顾性分析。在DSA和/或TCD上,两位观察者发现了32处和28处狭窄闭塞性病变。三维TOF MRA比三维PC MRA更敏感(分别为87%和86% 对比 65%和60%),并且具有更高的阴性预测值(96%对比89%)。三维TOF MRA对狭窄的正确分级率为78%,三维PC MRA为65%。

相似文献

1
Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: comparison of 3D time-of-flight and 3D phase-contrast MR angiography.颅内血管狭窄与闭塞:三维时间飞跃法与三维相位对比磁共振血管造影的比较
Neuroradiology. 1998 Sep;40(9):567-73. doi: 10.1007/s002340050645.
2
Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of renal transplants.肾移植的钆增强磁共振血管造影
Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;15(1):13-20. doi: 10.1016/s0730-725x(96)00348-7.
3
Added diagnostic values of three-dimensional high-resolution proton density-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the circle-of-Willis: Comparison with time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography.三维高分辨质子密度加权磁共振成像对颅内未破裂动脉瘤的诊断价值:与时间飞跃磁共振血管造影的比较。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 3;15(12):e0243235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243235. eCollection 2020.
4
Sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for high spatial resolution time-of-flight MR angiography of the intracranial arteries at 3.0 T.用于3.0T颅内动脉高空间分辨率时间飞跃磁共振血管造影的敏感性编码(SENSE)
Rofo. 2004 Jan;176(1):21-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-814673.
5
Evaluation of intracranial aneurysms with 7 T versus 1.5 T time-of-flight MR angiography - initial experience.7T与1.5T时间飞跃磁共振血管造影术评估颅内动脉瘤——初步经验
Rofo. 2009 Jan;181(1):16-23. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1027863. Epub 2008 Dec 29.
6
Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated by flow diverter: comparison of three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography (3D-TOF-MRA) and contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) sequences with digital subtraction angiography as the gold standard.血流导向装置治疗颅内动脉瘤的随访:以数字减影血管造影为金标准比较三维时间飞跃磁共振血管造影(3D-TOF-MRA)和对比增强磁共振血管造影(CE-MRA)序列
J Neurointerv Surg. 2016 Jan;8(1):81-6. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011449. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
7
Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with stent-assisted coiling: Comparison of contrast-enhanced MRA, time-of-flight MRA, and digital subtraction angiography.支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗颅内动脉瘤的随访:对比增强磁共振血管造影、时间飞跃磁共振血管造影和数字减影血管造影的比较
J Neuroradiol. 2017 Feb;44(1):44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
8
Detection of intracranial atherosclerotic steno-occlusive disease with 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography with sensitivity encoding at 3T.采用3T磁共振血管造影三维时间飞跃法及敏感性编码技术检测颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄闭塞性疾病
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007 Mar;28(3):439-46.
9
Validation of transcranial Doppler with magnetic resonance angiography in acute cerebral ischemia.经颅多普勒与磁共振血管造影在急性脑缺血中的验证。
J Neuroimaging. 2011 Apr;21(2):e34-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2009.00412.x.
10
Three-dimensional time-of-flight (3D TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and contrast-enhanced MRA of intracranial aneurysms treated with platinum coils.使用铂线圈治疗的颅内动脉瘤的三维时间飞跃(3D TOF)磁共振血管造影(MRA)和对比增强MRA
Acta Radiol. 2008 Mar;49(2):190-6. doi: 10.1080/02841850701732940.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantitative Time-of-Flight Head Magnetic Resonance Angiography of Cerebrovascular Disease.脑血管疾病的定量飞行时间头部磁共振血管造影
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2025 Jan;61(1):404-412. doi: 10.1002/jmri.29395. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
2
Intracranial arterial flow velocity mapping in quantitative time-of-flight MR angiography using deep machine learning.使用深度学习的定量时间飞跃磁共振血管造影中的颅内动脉血流速度图。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2023 Jul;100:10-17. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2023.02.005. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
3
Intensity of arterial structure acquired by Silent MRA estimates cerebral blood flow.
通过无声磁共振血管造影(Silent MRA)获取的动脉结构强度可估计脑血流量。
Insights Imaging. 2021 Dec 11;12(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s13244-021-01132-0.
4
Quantitative time-of-flight MR angiography for simultaneous luminal and hemodynamic evaluation of the intracranial arteries.定量时间飞跃磁共振血管成像在颅内动脉腔内和血流动力学评估中的应用。
Magn Reson Med. 2022 Jan;87(1):150-162. doi: 10.1002/mrm.28969. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
5
Compressed sensing time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography with high spatial resolution for evaluating intracranial aneurysms: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.采用高空间分辨率压缩感知时间飞跃磁共振血管造影评估颅内动脉瘤:与数字减影血管造影的比较。
Neuroradiol J. 2021 Jun;34(3):213-221. doi: 10.1177/1971400920988099. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
6
Middle cerebral artery pressure laterality in patients with symptomatic ICA stenosis.症状性颈内动脉狭窄患者大脑中动脉压力侧别。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 8;16(1):e0245337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245337. eCollection 2021.
7
Non-contrast MR angiography versus contrast enhanced MR angiography for detection of renal artery stenosis: a comparative analysis in 400 renal arteries.非对比增强磁共振血管成像与对比增强磁共振血管成像在检测肾动脉狭窄中的对比分析:400 例肾动脉的对比分析。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 May;46(5):2064-2071. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02836-5. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
8
Composite MRA: statistical approach to generate an MR angiogram from multiple contrasts.复合 MRA:从多种对比中生成磁共振血管造影图的统计方法。
Magn Reson Med. 2020 Mar;83(3):830-843. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27966. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
9
Clinical Evaluation of Highly Accelerated Compressed Sensing Time-of-Flight MR Angiography for Intracranial Arterial Stenosis.高加速压缩感知时间飞跃磁共振血管成像技术在颅内动脉狭窄中的临床评估。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Oct;39(10):1833-1838. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5786. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
10
Quantifying Intracranial Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis on MR Angiography.磁共振血管造影术量化颅内颈内动脉狭窄
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 May;38(5):986-990. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5113. Epub 2017 Mar 16.