Scriven P M
Medical School, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston.
Br J Anaesth. 1998 Aug;81(2):268-70. doi: 10.1093/bja/81.2.268.
One hundred and six former or current flexible trainees in anaesthesia responded to a questionnaire evaluating their part-time training (a response rate of 71%). They were compared with a group of 32 flexible trainees in obstetrics and gynaecology. Anaesthetists were more satisfied than obstetricians and gynaecologists with their training (96% compared with 84%); opportunities to publish (75% and 63%); research training (63% and 48%); and monitoring of their progress (78% and 67%). Without flexible training, 20% of the anaesthetists would have ceased to train, compared with 9% of the obstetrics and gynaecology group. Nearly all those who had finished their training were working as consultants (54% of the whole group); 4% had either retired, become a clinical assistant or a locum consultant. The remainder (42%) were senior registrars.
106名麻醉科的 former或current灵活培训学员对一份评估其兼职培训情况的问卷做出了回应(回应率 71%)。他们与32名妇产科灵活培训学员组成的一组进行了比较。麻醉科医生对其培训的满意度高于妇产科医生(96%对84%);发表论文的机会(75%和63%);研究培训(63%和48%);以及对他们进展的监测(78%和67%)。若没有灵活培训,20%的麻醉科医生会停止培训,而妇产科组这一比例为9%。几乎所有完成培训的人都担任顾问工作(占整个组的54%);4%已退休、成为临床助理或临时顾问。其余(42%)是高级住院医师。