• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

气管内吸痰:文献综述

Endotracheal suctioning: a literature review.

作者信息

Wood C J

机构信息

Intensive Care Unit, Pilgrim Hospital, Boston, UK.

出版信息

Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 1998 Jun;14(3):124-36. doi: 10.1016/s0964-3397(98)80375-3.

DOI:10.1016/s0964-3397(98)80375-3
PMID:9814217
Abstract

Endotracheal suctioning (ETS) is a necessary practice carried out in intensive care units. In involves the removal of pulmonary secretions from a patient with an artificial airway in place. All intensive care nurses should be aware when performing this intervention of the potential hazards a patient is exposed to, and should endeavour to prevent or minimize these. This literature review explores the criteria available to indicate a need for ETS and discusses the potential adverse effects of ETS and how these can be avoided during the procedure. The question is raised as to the frequency with which the procedure should be performed. The current dilemma facing nurses is the overwhelming view that ETS should be performed only when indicated as necessary by assessment, to minimize the exposure of the patient to the hazards of ETS, but also recognition that ETS is a necessary procedure to maintain a patent airway and clear secretions. As nurses are accountable for all aspects of their practice, they need to be able to make an informed choice about the frequency with which ETS is performed. It is hoped that this review will increase nurses' awareness of the potential hazards surrounding ETS, and enable them to question their practices regarding their ability to assess individual patient needs and determine the frequency with which ETS should be performed.

摘要

气管内吸痰(ETS)是重症监护病房中一项必要的操作。它涉及从有气管插管的患者体内清除肺部分泌物。所有重症监护护士在进行此项操作时都应意识到患者可能面临的潜在风险,并应努力预防或尽量减少这些风险。这篇文献综述探讨了表明需要进行气管内吸痰的可用标准,并讨论了气管内吸痰的潜在不良影响以及如何在操作过程中避免这些影响。文中还提出了关于该操作应进行频率的问题。护士目前面临的困境是,一方面普遍认为只有在评估表明必要时才应进行气管内吸痰,以尽量减少患者接触气管内吸痰的风险,另一方面也认识到气管内吸痰是维持气道通畅和清除分泌物的必要操作。由于护士要对其操作的各个方面负责,他们需要能够就是否进行气管内吸痰以及进行的频率做出明智的选择。希望这篇综述能提高护士对气管内吸痰潜在风险的认识,并使他们能够审视自己评估个体患者需求以及确定气管内吸痰频率的能力的做法。

相似文献

1
Endotracheal suctioning: a literature review.气管内吸痰:文献综述
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 1998 Jun;14(3):124-36. doi: 10.1016/s0964-3397(98)80375-3.
2
An observational study on the open-system endotracheal suctioning practices of critical care nurses.一项关于重症护理护士开放式气管内吸痰操作的观察性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Feb;17(3):360-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01990.x.
3
Assessing the need for endotracheal suction.评估气管内吸痰的必要性。
Paediatr Nurs. 1999 Feb;11(1):14-7.
4
Endotracheal suction for adult, non-head-injured, patients. A review of the literature.
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 1993 Dec;9(4):274-8. doi: 10.1016/s0964-3397(05)80011-4.
5
An evaluation of a teaching intervention to improve the practice of endotracheal suctioning in intensive care units.一项关于改善重症监护病房气管内吸痰操作的教学干预评估。
J Clin Nurs. 2001 Sep;10(5):682-96. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2001.00519.x.
6
[Development of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for endotracheal suction in premature infants].[早产儿气管内吸引循证临床实践指南的制定]
Hu Li Za Zhi. 2014 Feb;61(1):42-53. doi: 10.6224/JN.61.1.42.
7
Survey of Italian intensive care unit nurses' knowledge about endotracheal suctioning guidelines.意大利重症监护病房护士关于气管内吸痰指南的知识调查。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2014 Dec;30(6):339-45. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2014.06.003. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
8
Is paediatric endotracheal suctioning by nurses evidence based? An International Survey.护士进行儿科经气管吸引是否有循证依据?一项国际调查。
Nurs Crit Care. 2021 Sep;26(5):372-379. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12644. Epub 2021 May 2.
9
Can nurses safely assess the need for endotracheal suction in short-term ventilated patients, instead of using routine techniques?护士能否安全地评估短期通气患者气管内吸痰的需求,而不是使用常规技术?
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 1998 Aug;14(4):170-8. doi: 10.1016/s0964-3397(98)80486-2.
10
Endotracheal suction in intensive care: A point prevalence study of current practice in New Zealand and Australia.重症监护室内的气管内吸引:新西兰和澳大利亚当前实践的现况调查。
Aust Crit Care. 2019 Mar;32(2):112-115. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Endotracheal suctioning in intubated newborns: an integrative literature review.气管插管新生儿的气管内吸痰:一项综合文献综述。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2015 Jul-Sep;27(3):284-92. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20150048.
2
Open and Closed Endotracheal Suctioning and Arterial Blood Gas Values: A Single-Blind Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial.开放式与封闭式气管内吸痰及动脉血气值:一项单盲交叉随机临床试验。
Crit Care Res Pract. 2015;2015:470842. doi: 10.1155/2015/470842. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
3
Physiotherapy for adult patients with critical illness: recommendations of the European Respiratory Society and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Task Force on Physiotherapy for Critically Ill Patients.
成年危重症患者的物理治疗:欧洲呼吸学会和欧洲重症监护医学学会危重症患者物理治疗特别工作组的建议
Intensive Care Med. 2008 Jul;34(7):1188-99. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1026-7. Epub 2008 Feb 19.
4
Closed tracheal suction systems versus open tracheal suction systems for mechanically ventilated adult patients.用于机械通气成年患者的密闭式气管吸痰系统与开放式气管吸痰系统的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;2007(4):CD004581. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004581.pub2.