Panitsa E, Rosenwald J C, Kappas C
Medical Physics Department, University of Patras, Greece.
Phys Med Biol. 1998 Oct;43(10):2807-16. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/43/10/010.
Detailed quality control (QC) protocols are a necessity for modern radiotherapy departments. The established QC protocols for treatment planning systems (TPS) do not include recommendations on the advanced features of three-dimensional (3D) treatment planning, like the dose volume histograms (DVH). In this study, a test protocol for DVH characteristics was developed. The protocol assesses the consistency of the DVH computation to the dose distribution calculated by the same TPS by comparing DVH parameters with values obtained by the isodose distributions. The computation parameters (such as the dimension of the computation grid) that are applied to the TPS during the tests are not fixed but set by the user as if the test represents a typical clinical case. Six commercial TPS were examined with this protocol within the frame of the EC project Dynarad (Biomed I). The results of the intercomparison prove the consistency of the DVH results to the isodose values for most of the examined TPS. However, special attention should be paid when working with cases of adverse conditions such as high dose gradient regions. In these cases, higher errors are derived, especially when an insufficient number of dose calculation points are used for the DVH computation.
详细的质量控制(QC)方案对于现代放疗科室来说是必不可少的。已确立的治疗计划系统(TPS)质量控制方案并未包含关于三维(3D)治疗计划高级特性的建议,比如剂量体积直方图(DVH)。在本研究中,制定了一项针对DVH特性的测试方案。该方案通过将DVH参数与通过等剂量分布获得的值进行比较,评估DVH计算与同一TPS计算的剂量分布之间的一致性。测试期间应用于TPS的计算参数(如计算网格的维度)并非固定不变,而是由用户设定,就好像测试代表一个典型的临床病例。在欧盟委员会项目Dynarad(生物医学I)框架内,使用该方案对六个商用TPS进行了检查。相互比较的结果证明,对于大多数被检查的TPS,DVH结果与等剂量值具有一致性。然而,在处理诸如高剂量梯度区域等不利条件的病例时应格外注意。在这些情况下,会产生更高的误差,尤其是当用于DVH计算的剂量计算点数量不足时。