Gossman Michael S, Bank Morris I
Tri-State Regional Cancer Center, Medical Physics Section, 706, 23 Street, Ashland, Kentucky, USA.
J Med Phys. 2010 Oct;35(4):197-201. doi: 10.4103/0971-6203.71759.
Dose-volume histograms provide key information to radiation oncologists when they assess the adequacy of a patient treatment plan in radiation therapy. It is important therefore that all clinically relevant data be accurate. In this article we present the first quality assurance routine involving a direct comparison of planning system results with the results obtained from independent hand calculations. Given a known three-dimensional (3-D) structure such as a parallelepiped, a simple beam arrangement, and known physics beam data, a time-efficient and reproducible method for verifying the accuracy of volumetric statistics (DVH) from a radiation therapy treatment planning system (TPS) can be employed rapidly, satisfying the QA requirements for (TPS) commissioning, upgrades, and annual checks. Using this method, the maximum disagreement was only 1.7% for 6 MV and 1.3% for 18 MV photon energies. The average accuracy was within 0.6% for 6 MV and 0.4% for 18 MV for all depth-dose results. A 2% disagreement was observed with the treatment planning system DVH from defined volume comparison to the known structure dimensions.
剂量体积直方图在放射肿瘤学家评估放射治疗中患者治疗计划的充分性时提供关键信息。因此,所有临床相关数据准确很重要。在本文中,我们介绍了首个质量保证程序,该程序涉及将计划系统结果与独立手工计算结果进行直接比较。给定一个已知的三维(3-D)结构,如平行六面体、简单的射束布置以及已知的物理射束数据,一种快速、可重复且高效的方法可用于验证放射治疗治疗计划系统(TPS)中体积统计数据(DVH)的准确性,满足TPS调试、升级和年度检查的质量保证要求。使用这种方法,对于6兆伏光子能量,最大差异仅为1.7%,对于18兆伏光子能量,最大差异为1.3%。对于所有深度剂量结果,6兆伏时平均准确度在0.6%以内,18兆伏时平均准确度在0.4%以内。从定义体积与已知结构尺寸的比较来看,与治疗计划系统DVH存在2%的差异。