• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术中眼部溅伤的风险。

The risk of eye splash injuries in surgery.

作者信息

Marasco S, Woods S

机构信息

Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Surg. 1998 Nov;68(11):785-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1998.tb04677.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1445-2197.1998.tb04677.x
PMID:9814742
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study arose out of a concern about the transmission of infectious diseases through eye splash injuries in surgery. The purpose of this study was to identify the extent of the risk of eye splash injuries.

METHODS

A prospective trial was undertaken which examined 160 consecutive eye shields used by surgeons and assistants in operations of 30 min or longer. The shields were inspected for macroscopic splashes and then tested for microscopic splashes using reagent strips.

RESULTS

Of the 160 eye shields used in surgery, 71 tested positive for blood (44%). The surgeon was aware of a spray episode in only 13 cases (8%). The splashes were macroscopically visible in only 26 (16%) cases. The risk of eye splash was higher for the surgeon than for the assistants and increased with the length of the operation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that the risk of eye splash injury in surgery is much greater than that perceived by most surgeons and trainees. Eye protection should be mandatory for all personnel in the operating theatre, particularly for those directly involved with the operation.

摘要

背景

本研究源于对手术中因眼部溅伤导致传染病传播的担忧。本研究的目的是确定眼部溅伤风险的程度。

方法

进行了一项前瞻性试验,检查了外科医生和助手在30分钟或更长时间的手术中连续使用的160个眼罩。检查眼罩是否有肉眼可见的飞溅物,然后使用试剂条检测是否有微观飞溅物。

结果

在手术中使用的160个眼罩中,71个血液检测呈阳性(44%)。外科医生仅在13例(8%)中意识到有喷雾事件。飞溅物仅在26例(16%)中肉眼可见。外科医生眼部溅伤的风险高于助手,且随着手术时间的延长而增加。

结论

本研究表明,手术中眼部溅伤的风险比大多数外科医生和实习生所认为的要大得多。手术室所有人员都应强制佩戴眼部防护用品,特别是那些直接参与手术的人员。

相似文献

1
The risk of eye splash injuries in surgery.手术中眼部溅伤的风险。
Aust N Z J Surg. 1998 Nov;68(11):785-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1998.tb04677.x.
2
Risk of blood splashes to the eye during surgery.手术期间眼睛溅到血液的风险。
S Afr J Surg. 2009 Feb;47(1):7-9.
3
The risk of eye splash in burn surgery.烧伤手术中眼睛溅入的风险。
Burns. 2009 Jun;35(4):587-9. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2008.08.008. Epub 2008 Oct 31.
4
[Management of occupational exposure to HIV and viral hepatitis].[职业性接触艾滋病毒和病毒性肝炎的管理]
Rev Infirm. 2013 Jan(187):53-4.
5
A prospective study of blood splatter in ENT.一项关于耳鼻喉科血液飞溅的前瞻性研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Jul;272(7):1809-12. doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-3469-5. Epub 2015 Jan 25.
6
Blood-borne diseases in 1998: an overview.1998年的血源性疾病:概述
Bull Am Coll Surg. 1998 Oct;83(10):13-8.
7
Should eye protection be worn during dermatological surgery: prospective observational study.皮肤科手术期间是否应佩戴眼部防护装置:前瞻性观察研究。
Br J Dermatol. 2007 Jun;156(6):1258-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.07930.x.
8
Occupational blood-borne diseases in surgery.外科职业性血源传播疾病
Am J Surg. 2005 Aug;190(2):249-54. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.05.021.
9
Blood splash injury: an underestimated risk in endourology.血液飞溅伤:腔内泌尿外科中被低估的风险。
J Endourol. 2008 Jun;22(6):1183-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0052.
10
Blood-Borne Pathogens in Emergency Medicine.急诊医学中的血源性病原体
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Dec;70(6):939-940. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.08.026.

引用本文的文献

1
Bacterial contamination of endoscopist and assistant face visors during gastrointestinal endoscopy: a pilot study.胃肠内镜检查期间内镜医师和助手面部面罩的细菌污染:一项试点研究。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2023 Jul 6;14(6):505-511. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2023-102427. eCollection 2023.
2
Establishing local manufacture of PPE for healthcare workers in the time of a global pandemic.在全球大流行期间建立针对医护人员的个人防护装备本地生产。
Heliyon. 2023 Feb;9(2):e13349. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13349. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
3
Visualization of Airborne Particles as a Risk for Microbial Contamination in Orthopedic Surgery.
可视化空气中的微粒作为骨科手术中微生物污染的一个风险因素
Front Surg. 2021 Nov 22;8:754785. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.754785. eCollection 2021.
4
Hepatitis C virus: Morphogenesis, infection and therapy.丙型肝炎病毒:形态发生、感染与治疗
World J Hepatol. 2018 Feb 27;10(2):186-212. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v10.i2.186.
5
A prospective study of blood splatter in ENT.一项关于耳鼻喉科血液飞溅的前瞻性研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Jul;272(7):1809-12. doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-3469-5. Epub 2015 Jan 25.
6
Contamination resulting from aerosolized fluid during laparoscopic surgery.腹腔镜手术期间雾化液体导致的污染。
JSLS. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00361.
7
Universal precautions and surgery in Sierra Leone: the unprotected workforce.塞拉利昂的通用防护措施与外科手术:未受保护的工作人员。
World J Surg. 2009 Jun;33(6):1194-6. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0014-6.
8
Blood and body fluid splashes during surgery--the need for eye protection and masks.手术过程中的血液和体液飞溅——眼部防护和口罩的必要性。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007 Nov;89(8):770-2. doi: 10.1308/003588407X209301.
9
Universal precaution compliance by orthopaedic trauma team members in a major trauma resuscitation scenario.在重大创伤复苏场景中,骨科创伤团队成员对通用预防措施的遵守情况。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007 Apr;89(3):262-7. doi: 10.1308/003588407X168370.