Tolcher A W, O'Shaughnessy J A, Weiss R B, Zujewski J, Myhand R C, Schneider E, Hakim F, Gress R, Goldspiel B, Noone M H, Brewster L R, Gossard M R, Cowan K H
Medicine Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Clin Cancer Res. 1997 May;3(5):755-60.
Inhibitors of topoisomerase I and topoisomerase II have demonstrated synergy when administered sequentially in several tumor models while having a diminished antitumor effect when given concurrently. To explore the potential for clinical sequence-dependent synergy, we instituted a Phase I study of topotecan (a topoisomerase I inhibitor) followed by doxorubicin (a topoisomerase II inhibitor) in patients with advanced malignancies. Thirty-three patients with advanced malignancies or malignancies for whom no standard therapy exists were entered into the study. Topotecan was administered in escalating doses by 72-h continuous infusion on days 1, 2, and 3, followed by a bolus of doxorubicin given on day 5. To explore the hematological toxicity associated with this sequence, bone marrow aspirates were obtained both prior to the topotecan infusion and immediately prior to the doxorubicin in 10 patients to determine by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis whether CD34+ cell synchronization was occurring using this sequential schedule. Dose-limiting hematological toxicity occurred at the first dose-level in three of six patients. Therefore, we defined the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) below our starting dose-level. Further dose-escalation and a new MTD were defined with the addition of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). The MTD was, therefore, topotecan 0.35 mg/m2/day continuous i.v. infusion on days 1, 2, and 3, followed by doxorubicin 45 mg/m2 on day 5 without G-CSF, whereas the MTD with G-CSF was topotecan 0.75 mg/m2/day by 72-h continuous i.v. infusion, followed by doxorubicin 45 mg/m2 i.v. bolus on day 5. Ten patients with paired bone marrow aspirates obtained before topotecan and before doxorubicin administrations were available for evaluation. In 7 of 10 patients, there was an increase (16.6 +/- 2.9% to 25.0 +/- 3.5%; P < 0.02) in the proportion of CD34+ cells in S-phase 24 h after the topotecan infusion and prior to doxorubicin compared to the pretreatment values, whereas 1 patient had a decrease in the proportion of CD34+ cells in S phase and 2 patients had no change. Topotecan and doxorubicin with this sequence and schedule can be given safely; the dose-limiting toxicity is hematological toxicity. Alterations in the fraction of hematopoietic progenitor CD34+ cells in S-phase may account for the increased granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia observed at relatively low dose levels of the combination with and without G-CSF.
在多个肿瘤模型中,拓扑异构酶I抑制剂和拓扑异构酶II抑制剂序贯给药时显示出协同作用,而同时给药时抗肿瘤作用减弱。为了探索临床序列依赖性协同作用的潜力,我们开展了一项针对晚期恶性肿瘤患者的I期研究,先给予拓扑替康(一种拓扑异构酶I抑制剂),随后给予多柔比星(一种拓扑异构酶II抑制剂)。33例晚期恶性肿瘤患者或无标准治疗方案的恶性肿瘤患者进入该研究。拓扑替康在第1、2和3天通过72小时持续静脉输注递增剂量给药,随后在第5天给予一剂多柔比星静脉推注。为了探索与该给药顺序相关的血液学毒性,在10例患者中,于拓扑替康输注前和多柔比星给药前即刻获取骨髓穿刺样本,通过荧光激活细胞分选分析确定使用该序贯方案是否会发生CD34+细胞同步化。6例患者中有3例在首个剂量水平出现剂量限制性血液学毒性。因此,我们将最大耐受剂量(MTD)定义在起始剂量水平以下。随着粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)的加入,进一步进行了剂量递增并确定了新的MTD。因此,MTD为在第1、2和3天持续静脉输注拓扑替康0.35mg/m²/天,随后在第5天给予多柔比星45mg/m²,不使用G-CSF;而使用G-CSF时的MTD为通过72小时持续静脉输注拓扑替康0.75mg/m²/天,随后在第5天给予多柔比星45mg/m²静脉推注。10例在拓扑替康和多柔比星给药前获取配对骨髓穿刺样本的患者可用于评估。在10例患者中的7例中,与预处理值相比,拓扑替康输注后且在多柔比星给药前24小时,S期CD34+细胞比例增加(从16.6±2.9%增至25.0±3.5%;P<0.02),而1例患者S期CD34+细胞比例降低,2例患者无变化。按此顺序和方案给予拓扑替康和多柔比星是安全的;剂量限制性毒性为血液学毒性。S期造血祖细胞CD34+细胞比例的改变可能解释了在使用和不使用G-CSF的联合治疗相对低剂量水平时观察到的粒细胞减少和血小板减少增加的现象。