Chambers S K, Davis C A, Chambers J T, Schwartz P E, Lorber M I, Hschumacher R E
Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Surgery, and Pharmacology and Comprehensive Cancer Center Clinical Research Office, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8063, USA.
Clin Cancer Res. 1996 Oct;2(10):1699-704.
Our objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of cyclosporin A (CsA) delivered as a loading dose (LD) and continuous i.v. infusion (CI) in combination with carboplatin in patients with refractory gynecologic cancers. Twenty-nine heavily pretreated patients (25 ovarian epithelial, 2 cervical, and 2 endometrial carcinomas) received 113 cycles of CsA and carboplatin from September 1989 to September 1991. Twenty-four of these 29 carcinomas were strictly defined to be platinum resistant. CsA was administered as a LD escalated from 6 to 10 mg/kg followed by a 24-h CI from 2.5 to 14.5 mg/kg/day. Carboplatin was targeted to an area under the time versus concentration curve (AUC) of 6 mg/ml x min and was not dose escalated. Whole-blood CsA concentrations (fluorescence polarization immunoassay) at the maximum tolerated dose (10 mg/kg LD, 14.5 mg/kg/day CI) ranged from 2.4 to 3.0 microgram/ml over 12 h. Estimated median carboplatin AUC, based on calculated carboplatin clearance, was 7.9 mg/ml x min. The dose-limiting toxicity of the combination of CsA and carboplatin was grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 35% of the patients, which could be explained by the effects of carboplatin (AUC of 6 mg/ml x min) alone. Overall, neutropenia occurred in 24% of the patients and anemia in 17% of the patients. Grade 3 or 4 nausea or vomiting was noted in 10 and 14% of the patients, respectively. Grade 3 hypertension during CsA administration occurred in 14% of the patients. No grade 3 or 4 nephrotoxicity was seen in this trial. Three objective responses were noted: one complete response (11 months) and one partial response (5 months), both in potentially platinum-sensitive patients with platinum-free intervals of only 9 months each. One platinum-resistant patient had a partial response for 21 months. Five additional patients experienced >75% reduction of CA-125 or a return to a normal CA-125 titer. We concluded that whole-blood CsA concentrations of >3.0 microgram/ml (as seen when CsA is used as a modulator of multidrug resistance) were not achievable in this combination with carboplatin in this population of heavily pretreated gynecologic cancer patients. However, because CsA is used in this trial as a chemosensitizer in platinum-sensitive tumors and as a chemomodulator of platinum resistance, we targeted a CsA concentration of >1.0 microgram/ml, which was achieved. The CsA dose recommended for a Phase II trial of this combination is 10 mg/kg LD and 11.6 mg/kg/day CI, which results in blood CsA concentrations ranging from 1.2 to 1.3 microgram/ml over 12 h. Responses in this population of refractory gynecologic cancer patients are unusual, and these encouraging results form the basis for a Phase II trial of this combination.
我们的目标是确定环孢素A(CsA)作为负荷剂量(LD)和持续静脉输注(CI)与卡铂联合应用于难治性妇科癌症患者时的最大耐受剂量。1989年9月至1991年9月,29例经过大量预处理的患者(25例卵巢上皮癌、2例宫颈癌和2例子宫内膜癌)接受了113个周期的CsA和卡铂治疗。这29例癌症中,有24例被严格定义为铂耐药。CsA作为负荷剂量从6mg/kg逐步递增至10mg/kg,随后进行24小时持续静脉输注,剂量从2.5mg/kg/天至14.5mg/kg/天。卡铂的目标是时间-浓度曲线下面积(AUC)达到6mg/ml·min,且不进行剂量递增。在最大耐受剂量(10mg/kg负荷剂量,14.5mg/kg/天持续静脉输注)下,全血CsA浓度(荧光偏振免疫测定法)在12小时内范围为2.4至3.0μg/ml。基于计算的卡铂清除率,估计卡铂AUC中位数为7.9mg/ml·min。CsA与卡铂联合应用的剂量限制性毒性为4级血小板减少。3级或4级血小板减少发生在3%的患者中,这可能仅由卡铂(AUC为6mg/ml·min)的作用所解释。总体而言,24%的患者发生中性粒细胞减少,17%的患者发生贫血。分别有10%和14%的患者出现3级或4级恶心或呕吐。14%的患者在CsA给药期间出现3级高血压。该试验中未观察到3级或4级肾毒性。记录到3例客观缓解:1例完全缓解(11个月)和1例部分缓解(5个月),均发生在潜在铂敏感患者中,无铂间期均仅为9个月。1例铂耐药患者出现部分缓解21个月。另外5例患者CA-125降低>75%或CA-125水平恢复正常。我们得出结论,在这组经过大量预处理的妇科癌症患者中,与卡铂联合应用时,无法达到全血CsA浓度>3.0μg/ml(如将CsA用作多药耐药调节剂时所见)。然而,由于本试验中CsA在铂敏感肿瘤中用作化学增敏剂,在铂耐药中用作化学调节剂,我们将CsA浓度目标设定为>1.0μg/ml,这一目标得以实现。该联合方案II期试验推荐的CsA剂量为10mg/kg负荷剂量和11.6mg/kg/天持续静脉输注,这会使血CsA浓度在12小时内范围为1.2至1.3μg/ml。这组难治性妇科癌症患者的缓解情况并不常见,这些令人鼓舞的结果构成了该联合方案II期试验的基础。