Mohler J L, Chen Y, Hamil K, Hall S H, Cidlowski J A, Wilson E M, French F S, Sar M
Departments of Surgery, University of North Carolina-Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, 27599, USA.
Clin Cancer Res. 1996 May;2(5):889-95.
Differences in stromal and epithelial cell staining for androgen and glucocorticoid receptors (ARs and GRs) were investigated in 20 patients with clinically localized prostatic carcinoma treated by radical prostatectomy. Sections of benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatic carcinoma from each patient were stained with antibodies to AR and GR using an avidin-biotin peroxidase technique. The specificity of the GR immunoreactivity was established in benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatic carcinoma by immunohistochemistry using the GR antibody absorbed with synthetic peptide and Western blotting. Nuclear staining intensity and percentage of nuclei stained were summed to obtain AR and GR immunostaining scores. AR staining of prostatic carcinoma epithelial [103 +/- 58 (SD)] and stromal (126 +/- 48) nuclei was less than in benign prostatic hyperplasia (142 +/- 47 and 169 +/- 56; paired Student's t tests, P = 0.02 and P = 0.01); however, no difference in staining intensity occurred between stroma and epithelium in either tissue type. GR stained intensely in stromal cells from benign prostatic hyperplasia (189 +/- 50) and prostatic carcinoma (163 +/- 60). However, prostatic carcinoma epithelial cells (34 +/- 57) had low levels of glucocorticoid receptor staining (P < 10(-7)), and benign prostatic hyperplasia epithelium (74 +/- 51) was intermediate. In most patients, GR could not be detected in nuclei of prostatic carcinoma epithelial cells but was undiminished in stromal cell nuclei. There was no relationship by multivariate regression analysis between AR or GR staining and age, serum prostate-specific antigen, Gleason grade, or pathological stage. In comparison with AR, the greater variability of GR staining in epithelium versus stroma of prostatic carcinoma warrants further study of GR, particularly in the area of stromal-epithelial interaction.
对20例接受根治性前列腺切除术治疗的临床局限性前列腺癌患者,研究雄激素和糖皮质激素受体(ARs和GRs)在基质细胞和上皮细胞中的染色差异。采用抗生物素蛋白-生物素过氧化物酶技术,用抗AR和GR抗体对每位患者的良性前列腺增生组织和前列腺癌组织切片进行染色。通过使用与合成肽结合的GR抗体进行免疫组织化学和蛋白质印迹法,在良性前列腺增生和前列腺癌中确定GR免疫反应性的特异性。将核染色强度和染色核的百分比相加,以获得AR和GR免疫染色评分。前列腺癌上皮细胞核[103±58(标准差)]和基质细胞核(126±48)的AR染色低于良性前列腺增生(142±47和169±56;配对t检验,P=0.02和P=0.01);然而,两种组织类型的基质和上皮之间的染色强度没有差异。GR在良性前列腺增生的基质细胞(189±50)和前列腺癌的基质细胞(163±60)中染色强烈。然而,前列腺癌上皮细胞(34±57)的糖皮质激素受体染色水平较低(P<10^-7),良性前列腺增生上皮细胞(74±51)的染色水平介于两者之间。在大多数患者中,在前列腺癌上皮细胞核中未检测到GR,但在基质细胞核中未减少。通过多因素回归分析,AR或GR染色与年龄、血清前列腺特异性抗原、Gleason分级或病理分期之间没有关系。与AR相比,GR在前列腺癌上皮与基质中的染色变异性更大,这值得对GR进行进一步研究,特别是在基质-上皮相互作用领域。