Spencer-Green G, Spencer-Green E
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
J Rheumatol. 1998 Nov;25(11):2088-93.
Few studies have examined the practice patterns of primary care physicians who treat patients with rheumatoid (RA) or osteoarthritis (OA), and the strategies used when nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID) are ineffective or cause side effects. Our purpose was to study practice patterns of physicians who initiate treatment of RA and OA, and their management approaches when NSAID are ineffective or cause dyspepsia.
Using a structured questionnaire simulating management of patients with RA or OA we surveyed treatment preferences of primary care physicians.
Responses from 176 physicians were analyzed. For RA 98% used NSAID as initial therapy. For those patients who did not respond, most (over 60%) would either change or increase the initial NSAID and try a mean of 2.2 different NSAID over a period of 3.3 months before initiating second-line therapy or referring to a rheumatologist. For OA 67% of physicians surveyed initially used NSAID to treat these patients, and changing or increasing the NSAID was the most common strategy used to manage patients not responding to initial therapy. For patients who developed dyspepsia taking NSAID there was wide divergence of management approaches in both diseases: stopping the NSAID and starting an analgesic (OA) or second-line agent (RA) were common choices, but continuing the NSAID and adding an "antidyspeptic" regimen was chosen by over half of physicians selecting a single regimen. Most initial management approaches did not differ significantly between RA and OA.
NSAID are used frequently as initial therapy in patients with OA, and in RA the initiation of second-line therapy is often deferred for months and is only prescribed after patients have failed several NSAID. Opportunities exist to better standardize the approaches physicians use in the initial management of RA and OA, and to delineate what role NSAID should have in the management program of these disorders.
很少有研究调查治疗类风湿性关节炎(RA)或骨关节炎(OA)患者的初级保健医生的实践模式,以及在非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)无效或引起副作用时所采用的策略。我们的目的是研究开始治疗RA和OA的医生的实践模式,以及当NSAID无效或引起消化不良时他们的管理方法。
我们使用一份模拟RA或OA患者管理的结构化问卷,调查初级保健医生的治疗偏好。
分析了176名医生的回复。对于RA,98%的医生将NSAID作为初始治疗药物。对于那些没有反应的患者,大多数(超过60%)会改变或增加初始NSAID的剂量,并在开始二线治疗或转诊给风湿病专家之前,在3.3个月的时间内平均尝试2.2种不同的NSAID。对于OA,67%接受调查的医生最初使用NSAID治疗这些患者,改变或增加NSAID的剂量是治疗对初始治疗无反应患者最常用的策略。对于服用NSAID出现消化不良的患者,两种疾病的管理方法存在很大差异:停用NSAID并开始使用镇痛药(OA)或二线药物(RA)是常见的选择,但超过一半选择单一治疗方案的医生会选择继续使用NSAID并添加“抗消化不良”方案。RA和OA之间大多数初始管理方法没有显著差异。
NSAID在OA患者中经常被用作初始治疗药物,而在RA中,二线治疗的开始通常会推迟数月,并且只有在患者使用几种NSAID治疗失败后才会开出处方。存在改善医生在RA和OA初始管理中使用方法标准化的机会,并明确NSAID在这些疾病管理方案中应发挥的作用。