Sakai M, Imai T, Ohtake H, Otagiri M
Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Japan.
J Pharm Pharmacol. 1998 Oct;50(10):1101-8. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1998.tb03319.x.
This study was performed to evaluate the utility of absorption enhancers with reference to mucosal cell cytotoxicity. Overall assessment of the damage to plasma, lysosomal and nuclear membranes by three absorption enhancers, sodium deoxycholate, sodium caprate and dipotassium glycyrrhizinate, was performed on Caco-2 cell monolayers. The cytotoxicities of sodium deoxycholate (0.02-0.1% w/v), sodium caprate (0.1-0.5% w/v) and dipotassium glycyrrhizinate (0.5-2% w/v) were evaluated by the trypan blue-exclusion test, the protein-release test, the neutral-red assay, the DNA--propidium iodide staining test and the test for recovery of transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) up to 24 h after treatment with each enhancer. Sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS; 0.1% w/v), a potent surfactant, was used as positive control. SDS at this level was significantly cytotoxic whereas dipotassium glycyrrhizinate was not cytotoxic in any tests. Results from the trypan blue-exclusion and protein-release tests showed that high concentrations of sodium caprate (0.5% w/v) and sodium deoxycholate (0.1% w/v) were significantly cytotoxic to the plasma membrane. The neutral-red assay, an indicator of damage to lysosomal membranes, revealed that 0.5% (w/v) sodium caprate had no effect whereas the uptake of neutral red was slightly increased by treatment with 0.1% (w/v) sodium deoxycholate, implying that the compound had cell-growth-enhancing activity. Nuclear-membrane damage, as evaluated by the DNA--propidium iodide staining test, was severe in cell monolayers treated with 0.5% (w/v) sodium caprate compared with that induced by 0.1% (w/v) sodium deoxycholate. In the TEER recovery test, TEER failed to recover 24 h after treatment with 0.5% (w/v) sodium caprate and 0.1% (w/v) SDS, but recovered after treatment with 0.1% (w/v) sodium deoxycholate. The recovery of TEER might be related to nuclear membrane damage and cell-growth-enhancing activity. These results indicate that of the three classes of enhancer, dipotassium glycyrrhizinate was not cytotoxic and that high concentrations of sodium caprate and sodium deoxycholate could damage plasma and nuclear membranes.
本研究旨在评估吸收促进剂对黏膜细胞的细胞毒性及其效用。使用脱氧胆酸钠、癸酸钠和甘草酸二钾这三种吸收促进剂,对Caco-2细胞单层的质膜、溶酶体膜和核膜损伤进行总体评估。通过台盼蓝排斥试验、蛋白质释放试验、中性红试验、DNA-碘化丙啶染色试验以及在每种促进剂处理后长达24小时的跨上皮电阻(TEER)恢复试验,评估脱氧胆酸钠(0.02 - 0.1% w/v)、癸酸钠(0.1 - 0.5% w/v)和甘草酸二钾(0.5 - 2% w/v)的细胞毒性。强表面活性剂十二烷基硫酸钠(SDS;0.1% w/v)用作阳性对照。此浓度的SDS具有显著细胞毒性,而甘草酸二钾在任何试验中均无细胞毒性。台盼蓝排斥试验和蛋白质释放试验结果表明,高浓度的癸酸钠(0.5% w/v)和脱氧胆酸钠(0.1% w/v)对质膜具有显著细胞毒性。中性红试验作为溶酶体膜损伤的指标,显示0.5%(w/v)癸酸钠无影响,而0.1%(w/v)脱氧胆酸钠处理使中性红摄取略有增加,这意味着该化合物具有促进细胞生长的活性。通过DNA-碘化丙啶染色试验评估,与0.1%(w/v)脱氧胆酸钠相比,0.5%(w/v)癸酸钠处理的细胞单层核膜损伤严重。在TEER恢复试验中,0.5%(w/v)癸酸钠和0.1%(w/v)SDS处理后24小时TEER未能恢复,但0.1%(w/v)脱氧胆酸钠处理后TEER恢复。TEER的恢复可能与核膜损伤和促进细胞生长的活性有关。这些结果表明,在这三类促进剂中,甘草酸二钾无细胞毒性,高浓度的癸酸钠和脱氧胆酸钠可损伤质膜和核膜。