Suppr超能文献

2型糖尿病的降压治疗:糖尿病患者血压适度控制的意义(ABCD)试验

Antihypertensive therapy in type 2 diabetes: implications of the appropriate blood pressure control in diabetes (ABCD) trial.

作者信息

Estacio R O, Schrier R W

机构信息

Colorado Prevention Center and the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Department of Medicine, Denver Health Medical Center, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1998 Nov 12;82(9B):9R-14R. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00750-4.

Abstract

As the population ages, the incidence of type 2 diabetes will increase as will the incidence of concomitant vascular complications. Hypertension substantially increases the risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. Results from the recent Appropriate Blood Pressure Control in Diabetes (ABCD) trial demonstrated an advantage of an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (enalapril) over a long-acting calcium antagonist (nisoldipine) with regard to the incidence of cardiovascular events over a 5-year follow-up period in hypertensive persons with type 2 diabetes. This trial was a prospective, randomized, blinded study comparing the effects of moderate blood pressure control (target diastolic pressure 80-89 mm Hg) with those of intensive control (target diastolic pressure 75 mm Hg) on the incidence and progression of diabetic vascular complications. The study also compared nisoldipine with enalapril as first-line antihypertensive therapy in terms of prevention and progression of complications of diabetes. In 470 hypertensive patients, the incidence of fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarctions was significantly (p = 0.001) higher among those receiving nisoldipine (n = 25) compared with those receiving enalapril (n = 5). Comparison with previous studies suggests that the difference observed between nisoldipine and enalapril resulted from a beneficial effect of enalapril rather than a deleterious effect from nisoldipine. Since these findings in the ABCD trial are based on a secondary endpoint, they require confirmation. Nevertheless, they suggest that ACE inhibitors should be the initial antihypertensive medication used in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension.

摘要

随着人口老龄化,2型糖尿病的发病率将会上升,同时血管并发症的发病率也会增加。高血压会显著增加糖尿病患者患心血管疾病的风险。最近的糖尿病患者血压适当控制(ABCD)试验结果表明,在对2型糖尿病高血压患者进行5年随访期间,就心血管事件的发生率而言,血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂(依那普利)优于长效钙拮抗剂(尼索地平)。该试验是一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究,比较了适度血压控制(目标舒张压80 - 89 mmHg)与强化控制(目标舒张压75 mmHg)对糖尿病血管并发症发生率和进展的影响。该研究还比较了尼索地平与依那普利作为一线抗高血压治疗在预防糖尿病并发症和并发症进展方面的效果。在470名高血压患者中,接受尼索地平治疗的患者(n = 25)发生致命和非致命心肌梗死的发生率显著高于接受依那普利治疗的患者(n = 5)(p = 0.001)。与先前研究的比较表明,尼索地平与依那普利之间观察到的差异是由依那普利的有益作用而非尼索地平的有害作用导致的。由于ABCD试验中的这些发现基于次要终点,因此需要进一步证实。然而,这些发现表明ACE抑制剂应作为2型糖尿病合并高血压患者的初始抗高血压药物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验