• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Calcium antagonists and cardiovascular risk in diabetes.

作者信息

Parving H H

机构信息

Steno Diabetes Center, Gentofte, Denmark.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1998 Nov 12;82(9B):42R-44R. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00758-9.

DOI:10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00758-9
PMID:9822145
Abstract

Recent trials have linked calcium antagonists with adverse cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients with diabetes. A closer examination of these trials (in particular the Appropriate Blood Pressure Control in Diabetes [ABCD] trial and the Fosinopril Versus Amlodipine Cardiovascular Events Trial [FACET]) reveals a lack of data from which to draw conclusions of harm. In fact, based on the results of these trials and the recent Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) Trial, one may conclude that the combination of a calcium antagonist with an ACE inhibitor is a rational therapeutic choice in patients with coexisting hypertension and diabetes.

摘要

相似文献

1
Calcium antagonists and cardiovascular risk in diabetes.
Am J Cardiol. 1998 Nov 12;82(9B):42R-44R. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00758-9.
2
Calcium antagonists and the diabetic patient: a response to recent controversies.
Am J Cardiol. 1998 Nov 12;82(9B):40R-41R. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00757-7.
3
CCBs vs ACE inhibitors in patients with diabetes.糖尿病患者中钙通道阻滞剂与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的比较
J Fam Pract. 1998 Jul;47(1):12-3.
4
Comorbidity of hypertension and diabetes: the fosinopril versus amlodipine cardiovascular events trial (FACET).高血压与糖尿病合并症:福辛普利与氨氯地平心血管事件试验(FACET)
Am J Cardiol. 1998 Nov 12;82(9B):15R-19R. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00751-6.
5
New evidence on the prevention of cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病高血压患者心血管事件预防的新证据。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1998;32 Suppl 2:S18-23. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199800004-00004.
6
Prevention of cardiovascular events with an antihypertensive regimen of amlodipine adding perindopril as required versus atenolol adding bendroflumethiazide as required, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure Lowering Arm (ASCOT-BPLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial.盎格鲁-斯堪的纳维亚心脏结局试验-降压分支(ASCOT-BPLA):氨氯地平降压方案按需加用培哚普利与阿替洛尔按需加用苄氟噻嗪预防心血管事件的多中心随机对照试验
Lancet. 2005;366(9489):895-906. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67185-1.
7
Combinations of inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system with calcium channel blockers for the treatment of hypertension: focus on perindopril/amlodipine.血管紧张素转化酶抑制剂与钙通道阻滞剂联合治疗高血压:以培哚普利/氨氯地平为例。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Sep;26(9):2263-76. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.510925.
8
Outcome results of the Fosinopril Versus Amlodipine Cardiovascular Events Randomized Trial (FACET) in patients with hypertension and NIDDM.福辛普利与氨氯地平治疗心血管事件随机试验(FACET)在高血压合并非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者中的结果
Diabetes Care. 1998 Apr;21(4):597-603. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.4.597.
9
Amlodipine and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor combination versus amlodipine monotherapy in hypertension: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.氨氯地平和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂联合用药与氨氯地平单药治疗高血压的对比:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Blood Press Monit. 2010 Aug;15(4):195-204. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e32833a23d4.
10
Therapeutic benefits of ACE inhibitors and other antihypertensive drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂及其他抗高血压药物对2型糖尿病患者的治疗益处。
Diabetes Care. 2000 Jul;23(7):888-92. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.7.888.

引用本文的文献

1
Controversies surrounding the treatment of the hypertensive patient with diabetes.围绕糖尿病高血压患者治疗的争议。
Curr Hypertens Rep. 1999 Dec;1(6):512-20. doi: 10.1007/s11906-996-0024-9.
2
Management of hypertension. Ideal body weight is not realistic goal for lifestyle intervention.高血压的管理。理想体重并非生活方式干预的现实目标。
BMJ. 2000 Feb 26;320(7234):576; author reply 579-80.