• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于新型振动/旋转电动牙刷和高频电动牙刷安全性与有效性的交叉临床研究。

A crossover clinical investigation of the safety and efficacy of a new oscillating/rotating electric toothbrush and a high frequency electric toothbrush.

作者信息

Isaacs R L, Beiswanger B B, Rosenfield S T, Crawford J L, Mau M S, Eckert G J, Warren P R

机构信息

Oral Health Research Institute, Indianapolis, IN 46202-2876, USA.

出版信息

Am J Dent. 1998 Feb;11(1):7-12.

PMID:9823079
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy on plaque, gingivitis and calculus of an oscillating/rotating power toothbrush (Braun Oral-B Ultra Plaque Remover-D9) and a high frequency toothbrush (sonicare).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 6-week, randomized crossover study was carried out. A total of 62 healthy adult subjects completed the study and were assessed for plaque control, gingival condition and calculus control. At the end of the study, subjects completed a questionnaire which assessed their preferences for the two devices.

RESULTS

Both toothbrushes were found to be safe and effective, but a significantly lower gingival index (P = 0.002) and a lower calculus index (P = 0.022) was found in the D9 group. Assessment of patient preferences revealed that a significant majority of subjects in the study (65%) preferred the D9 to the high frequency toothbrush (27%). It is concluded that the D9 may offer greater potential for the maintenance of good gingival condition than the high frequency toothbrush, and that the greater preference for the D9 may be important with respect to long-term compliance. The implications of these findings are discussed.

摘要

目的

比较一款振荡/旋转电动牙刷(博朗欧乐-B超洁亮型-D9)和一款高频牙刷(声波震动牙刷)在清除牙菌斑、牙龈炎和牙结石方面的效果。

材料与方法

开展了一项为期6周的随机交叉研究。共有62名健康成年受试者完成了该研究,并接受了牙菌斑控制、牙龈状况和牙结石控制方面的评估。研究结束时,受试者完成了一份问卷,评估他们对这两款牙刷的偏好。

结果

发现两款牙刷均安全有效,但D9组的牙龈指数显著更低(P = 0.002),牙结石指数也更低(P = 0.022)。对患者偏好的评估显示,研究中的绝大多数受试者(65%)更喜欢D9,而不是高频牙刷(27%)。结论是,与高频牙刷相比,D9在维持良好牙龈状况方面可能具有更大潜力,并且对D9的更大偏好可能对长期依从性很重要。讨论了这些发现的意义。

相似文献

1
A crossover clinical investigation of the safety and efficacy of a new oscillating/rotating electric toothbrush and a high frequency electric toothbrush.一项关于新型振动/旋转电动牙刷和高频电动牙刷安全性与有效性的交叉临床研究。
Am J Dent. 1998 Feb;11(1):7-12.
2
A split-mouth comparison of a three-dimensional-action electric toothbrush and a high-frequency electric toothbrush for reducing plaque and gingivitis.三维动作电动牙刷与高频电动牙刷减少牙菌斑和牙龈炎的分口对照研究。
J Int Acad Periodontol. 2001 Oct;3(4):95-103.
3
A comparative clinical investigation of the safety and efficacy of an oscillating/rotating electric toothbrush and a sonic toothbrush.一款振动/旋转电动牙刷与一款声波牙刷安全性和有效性的对比临床研究。
J Clin Dent. 1995;6(1):108-12.
4
A comparison of two electric toothbrushes with respect to plaque removal and subject preference.两种电动牙刷在去除牙菌斑和受试者偏好方面的比较。
Am J Dent. 1998 Sep;11(Spec No):S29-33.
5
A 3-month clinical comparison of the safety and efficacy of two battery-operated toothbrushes: the Braun Oral-B Battery toothbrush and the Colgate Actibrush.两款电动牙刷(博朗欧乐-B电池驱动牙刷和高露洁动感牙刷)安全性和有效性的3个月临床比较。
Am J Dent. 2001 Nov;14 Spec No:13B-17B.
6
A single-use and 3-month clinical investigation of the comparative efficacy of a battery-operated power toothbrush and a manual toothbrush.一项关于电动牙刷和手动牙刷比较功效的一次性使用且为期3个月的临床研究。
Am J Dent. 2001 Nov;14 Spec No:19B-24B.
7
A six-week clinical evaluation of the plaque and gingivitis efficacy of an oscillating-rotating power toothbrush with a novel brush head utilizing angled CrissCross bristles versus a sonic toothbrush.一项为期六周的临床评估,比较一款采用新型刷头、带有成角度交叉刷毛的旋转振荡电动牙刷与一款声波牙刷在清除牙菌斑和治疗牙龈炎方面的功效。
J Clin Dent. 2014;25(2):6-12.
8
Safety, efficacy and acceptability of a new power toothbrush: a 3-month comparative clinical investigation.一款新型电动牙刷的安全性、有效性和可接受性:一项为期3个月的对比临床研究。
Am J Dent. 2001 Feb;14(1):3-7.
9
A 12-week clinical comparison of an oscillating-rotating power brush versus a marketed sonic brush with self-adjusting technology in reducing plaque and gingivitis.一项为期12周的临床比较:振荡旋转电动牙刷与一款具有自动调节技术的市售声波牙刷在减少牙菌斑和牙龈炎方面的效果。
J Clin Dent. 2013;24(2):55-61.
10
Efficacy of three toothbrushes on established gingivitis and plaque.三种牙刷对已患牙龈炎和牙菌斑的疗效。
Am J Dent. 2008 Dec;21(6):339-45.

引用本文的文献

1
The efficacy of an oscillating-rotating power toothbrush compared to a high-frequency sonic power toothbrush on parameters of dental plaque and gingival inflammation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.振荡旋转电动牙刷与高频超声电动牙刷对牙菌斑和牙龈炎症参数的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2023 Feb;21(1):77-94. doi: 10.1111/idh.12597. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
2
Comparison of sonic and ionic toothbrush in reduction in plaque and gingivitis.声波牙刷与离子牙刷在减少牙菌斑和牙龈炎方面的比较。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2011 Jul;15(3):210-4. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.85662.
3
Different powered toothbrushes for plaque control and gingival health.
用于控制牙菌斑和维护牙龈健康的不同动力牙刷。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Dec 8;2010(12):CD004971. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004971.pub2.