• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[一种患者分类系统:一种工具的构建与验证]

[A system of patient classification: construction and validation of an instrument].

作者信息

Perroca M G, Gaidzinski R R

机构信息

Escola de Enfermagem de Universidade de São Paulo.

出版信息

Rev Esc Enferm USP. 1998 Aug;32(2):153-68. doi: 10.1590/s0080-62341998000200009.

DOI:10.1590/s0080-62341998000200009
PMID:9823228
Abstract

This study had in its aim the construction and the validation of a patient classification instrument which has been based on the patient's individual necessities that require the nursing care. It was considered in the instrument 13 critical indicators: Mental State and Level of Consciousness. Breathing, Vital Signs, Nutrition and Hydration, Movement, Locomotion, Corporeal Hygiene, Eliminations, Therapy, Health Teaching, Behavior, Communication and Skin Integrety. Each one of these indicators has a 1 to 5 gradation denoting an increasing level in the nursing care complexity. The patient is classified in all the indicators in one of the five levels, in the option that better describes his/her situation. The content validation of the instrument was done by the Delphi Technique application through 2 rounds. A team of 15 nursing experts who attend patients or teach in the Medical School in São José do Rio Preto were participants in this research. The obtained results have showed the experts' agreement concerned to: the maintenance of the 13 critical indicators in the instrument; property and intelligibility of the critical indicator contents and the presence of an increasing level in the nursing care complexity.

摘要

本研究旨在构建并验证一种患者分类工具,该工具基于患者对护理的个体需求。该工具纳入了13项关键指标:精神状态与意识水平、呼吸、生命体征、营养与水合作用、活动、移动、身体卫生、排泄、治疗、健康教育、行为、沟通和皮肤完整性。这些指标中的每一项都有1至5级的分级,表示护理复杂性的增加。患者在所有指标中被归类为五个级别中的一个,选择最能描述其情况的级别。该工具的内容效度通过两轮德尔菲技术应用来完成。15名在圣若泽杜里奥普雷图的医学院照顾患者或授课的护理专家组成的团队参与了这项研究。所得结果表明专家们对以下方面达成了共识:工具中13项关键指标的保留、关键指标内容的特性和清晰度以及护理复杂性的增加。

相似文献

1
[A system of patient classification: construction and validation of an instrument].[一种患者分类系统:一种工具的构建与验证]
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 1998 Aug;32(2):153-68. doi: 10.1590/s0080-62341998000200009.
2
[Evaluation of an instrument for the classification of patients in four levels of dependency on nursing care].[一种用于将患者分为四个护理依赖等级的工具的评估]
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2000 Apr;8(2):74-82. doi: 10.1590/s0104-11692000000200012.
3
[Instrument for patient classification: users' opinions and analisys of healthcare indicators].[患者分类工具:用户意见及医疗保健指标分析]
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2008 Dec;42(4):656-64. doi: 10.1590/s0080-62342008000400007.
4
Measuring the unmeasurable: a caring science perspective on patient classification.
J Nurs Manag. 1998 May;6(3):165-72. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2834.1998.00062.x.
5
Using the Delphi survey technique to develop a professional definition of nursing for analysing nursing workload.运用德尔菲调查技术制定护理专业定义以分析护理工作量。
J Adv Nurs. 1994 May;19(5):1003-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01180.x.
6
Development and content validity of the new version of a patient classification instrument.新版患者分类工具的开发与内容效度
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2011 Jan-Feb;19(1):58-66. doi: 10.1590/s0104-11692011000100009.
7
Nursing resource definition in DRGs. RIMS/Nursing Acuity Project Group.诊断相关分组中的护理资源定义。RIMS/护理 acuity 项目组。
Nurs Econ. 1997 May-Jun;15(3):124-30, 137.
8
Nursing intensity: needed today for more than staffing.护理强度:如今所需的不仅仅是人员配备。
Nurs Econ. 1991 Nov-Dec;9(6):409-14.
9
Assessing patient category/dependence systems for determining the nurse/patient ratio in ICU and HDU: a review of approaches.评估用于确定重症监护病房(ICU)和高依赖病房(HDU)护士与患者比例的患者分类/依赖系统:方法综述
J Nurs Manag. 2004 Sep;12(5):299-308. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2004.00439.x.
10
[Perroca's patient classification instrument: construct validity analysis].[佩罗卡患者分类工具:结构效度分析]
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2004 Jan-Feb;12(1):83-91. doi: 10.1590/s0104-11692004000100012. Epub 2004 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Nursing workload: use of artificial intelligence to develop a classifier model.护理工作量:使用人工智能开发分类器模型。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2024 Jul 5;32:e4239. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.7131.4239. eCollection 2024.
2
Usability in the admission monitoring system of an emergency room.急诊室入院监测系统的可用性。
Rev Saude Publica. 2021 Dec 17;55:113. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055003475. eCollection 2021.
3
Content and construct validation of language acquisition enunciative signs in the second year of life.内容和结构验证语言习得表达符号在生命的第二年。
Codas. 2021 Dec 20;34(2):e20200252. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20202020252. eCollection 2021.
4
Construct Validity and Reliability of the Work Environment Assessment Instrument WE-10.工作环境评估工具 WE-10 的构建效度和信度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 9;17(20):7364. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207364.