Suppr超能文献

Prospective, randomized trial comparing pain and complications between diathermy and scissors for closed hemorrhoidectomy.

作者信息

Ibrahim S, Tsang C, Lee Y L, Eu K W, Seow-Choen F

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 1998 Nov;41(11):1418-20. doi: 10.1007/BF02237059.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess pain and complication rates after closed hemorrhoidectomy with the use of either scissors or diathermy excision.

METHODS

Ninety-one consecutive patients were prospectively randomly assigned by use of sealed envelopes to Group A (diathermy dissection; n = 44) or Group B (scissors dissection; n = 47). The resulting hemorrhoidal pedicle after hemorrhoidal dissection was transfixed and buried under the mucosa, which was closed with 3-0 chromic catgut.

RESULTS

The median time taken for surgery was ten minutes in both groups. The range for Group A was 5 to 25 minutes, and the range for Group B was 5 to 20 minutes. There were no statistically significant differences in the pain scores between the two groups for any of the seven postoperative days studied. The median number of pethidine injections in Group A was 1 and in Group B was 0 (P < 0.009). The number of oral analgesic tablets used was 8 (range, 4-10) and 14 (range, 0-10) for Groups A and B, respectively (P < 0.001). The number of tubes of topical lignocaine jelly used was 14 (range, 0-22) and 14 (range, 7-88) in Groups A and B, respectively. Two patients in each group developed secondary hemorrhage, but no patient had anal stricturing.

CONCLUSION

No excessive complications are seen with closed hemorrhoidectomy, and diathermy seems to require less postoperative analgesic medicine than scissors for closed hemorrhoidectomy except in the first 24 hours.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验