• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Multivessel coronary artery disease: elective stenting versus bypass surgery.

作者信息

Foley D P, Hermans W R, van Domburg R, Serruys P W

机构信息

Department of Coronary Diagnostics and Intervention, Thoraxcentre Academic Hospital, Dijkzigt, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Indian Heart J. 1998 Oct;50 Suppl 1:27-39.

PMID:9824905
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Multivessel coronary artery disease: elective stenting versus bypass surgery.
Indian Heart J. 1998 Oct;50 Suppl 1:27-39.
2
Comparison of bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease: results from the ARTS trial in Israel.冠状动脉搭桥术与支架置入术治疗多支血管病变的比较：以色列ARTS试验结果
Isr Med Assoc J. 2003 Aug;5(8):539-42.
3
One-year outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with multiple stenting for multisystem disease: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized clinical trials.冠状动脉旁路移植术与多系统疾病多支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的一年结局：来自随机临床试验个体患者数据的荟萃分析
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Aug;130(2):512-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.12.049.
4
Approach to the patient with prior bypass surgery.曾接受过搭桥手术患者的诊疗方法。
J Interv Cardiol. 2004 Oct;17(5):339-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2004.04033.x.
5
Comparison of drug-eluting stents and coronary artery bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel coronary disease: three-year follow-up results from a single institution.药物洗脱支架与冠状动脉搭桥手术治疗多支冠状动脉疾病的比较：单机构三年随访结果
Circulation. 2009 Apr 21;119(15):2040-50. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.819730. Epub 2009 Apr 6.
6
Coronary artery bypass is superior to drug-eluting stents in multivessel coronary artery disease.在多支冠状动脉疾病中，冠状动脉搭桥术优于药物洗脱支架。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Jun;81(6):1949-57. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.03.020.
7
Comparison of clinical outcome after elective and "bail out" coronary stent insertion.
J Invasive Cardiol. 1995 Jul-Aug;7(6):156-64.
8
Complete revascularization: coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention.完全血运重建：冠状动脉搭桥手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对比
Circulation. 2006 Jul 18;114(3):249-55. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.614420.
9
[Percutaneous revascularization of multivessel coronary disease with systematic stent implantation. Immediate results and clinical follow-up and middle term angiography].[多支冠状动脉疾病经皮血管重建并系统性支架植入。即刻结果、临床随访及中期血管造影]
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 2001 Feb;94(2):95-102.
10
Clinical and economic outcomes of multivessel coronary stenting compared with bypass surgery: a single-center US experience.多支冠状动脉支架置入术与搭桥手术的临床和经济结果比较：美国单中心经验
Am Heart J. 2003 Feb;145(2):334-42. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2003.38.