Suppr超能文献

由收缩力驱动的双腔频率应答起搏系统:1年随访后的最终评估。欧洲PEA临床研究组。

Dual chamber rate responsive pacing system driven by contractility: final assessment after 1-year follow-up. The European PEA Clinical Investigation Group.

作者信息

Clémenty J

机构信息

Haut L'Evéque Hospital, Bordeaux, France.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998 Nov;21(11 Pt 2):2192-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb01151.x.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the long-term performance of a new dual chamber rate responsive pacing system based on the dynamic measurement of the peak endocardial acceleration (PEA) index of cardiac contractility. Seventy patients who participated in the Multicenter European Clinical Evaluation were studied 1 year after implantation by continuously recording the PEA and the heart rate (HR) during exercise stress testing and during 24 hours of usual activities. A complete examination of standard parameters was also performed to assess the pacing/sensing lead characteristics. Statistical comparisons were performed with the data recorded with the same protocol at 1 month after implant for each patient. A linear correlation coefficient was calculated between PEA and sinus rate when the patient showed predominant atrial tracked rhythm. There were no significant differences between PEA values measured at 1 month and 1 year (PEA = 0.41 +/- 0.26 g vs 0.45 +/- 0.29 g at rest and PEA = 1.63 +/- 0.77 g vs 1.72 +/- 0.83 g during peak exercise). The correlation coefficient remained stable (0.67 +/- 0.15 vs 0.65 +/- 0.14 during daily life and 0.74 +/- 0.14 vs 0.77 +/- 0.11 during exercise). The PEA signal detected by the sensor was reliable and stable. No long-term complications or adverse effects were observed, and the lead performance was comparable to that of a standard lead.

摘要

本研究的目的是基于对心脏收缩力的峰值心内膜加速度(PEA)指数的动态测量,评估一种新型双腔频率应答起搏系统的长期性能。对参与多中心欧洲临床评估的70例患者在植入后1年进行研究,通过在运动负荷试验和24小时日常活动期间连续记录PEA和心率(HR)。还对标准参数进行了全面检查,以评估起搏/感知导线的特性。对每位患者植入后1个月按照相同方案记录的数据进行统计学比较。当患者表现为主要心房跟踪心律时,计算PEA与窦性心律之间的线性相关系数。在1个月和1年时测量的PEA值之间无显著差异(静息时PEA = 0.41±0.26 g vs 0.45±0.29 g,运动峰值时PEA = 1.63±0.77 g vs 1.72±0.83 g)。相关系数保持稳定(日常生活中为0.67±0.15 vs 0.65±0.14,运动时为0.74±0.14 vs 0.77±0.11)。传感器检测到的PEA信号可靠且稳定。未观察到长期并发症或不良反应,导线性能与标准导线相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验