Suppr超能文献

与扩张型心肌病相比,冠心病患者的压力反射敏感性和心率变异性

Baroreflex sensitivity and heart rate variability in coronary disease compared to dilated cardiomyopathy.

作者信息

Menz V, Grimm W, Hoffmann J, Born S, Schmidt C, Maisch B

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Philipps-University of Marburg, Germany.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998 Nov;21(11 Pt 2):2416-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb01193.x.

Abstract

This study was designed to compare baroreceptor sensitivity and heart rate variability as measures of cardiac autonomic tone in patients with coronary disease (CAD, n = 49) and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC, n = 130). Time domain heart rate variability, including SDNN, SDANN, and pNN50, was determined during 24-hour Holter ECG. Baroreflex sensitivity was analyzed nonivasively using the phenylephrine method. Baroreflex sensitivity and heart rate variability were comparable between patients with CAD versus IDC (baroreflex sensitivity: 6.1 +/- 3 vs 6.9 +/- 5 ms/mmHg; SDNN: 97 +/- 40 vs 114 +/- 41 ms; SDANN: 83 +/- 33 vs 99 +/- 41 ms; pNN50: 3.9 +/- 4 vs 9.6 +/- 13 ms, P = NS for all comparisons). Likewise, a subgroup analysis of patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < or = 30% showed no significant difference in baroreceptor sensitivity and heart rate variability between IDC and CAD patients. Patients with CAD and an LVEF > 30% had a decreased heart rate variability but not a decreased baroreflex sensitivity compared to patients with IDC and LVEF > 30% (baroreflex sensitivity: 6.4 +/- 4 vs 8.3 +/- 6 ms/mmHg, P = NS; SDNN: 98 +/- 19 vs 128 +/- 42 ms, P < 0.05; SDANN: 86 +/- 21 vs 112 +/- 43 ms, P < 0.05; pNN50: 4.2 +/- 3 vs 12.3 +/- 8 ms, P < 0.05). Patients with a markedly depressed LVEF show comparable alterations in cardiac autonomic tone whether they have CAD or IDC. Patients with CAD and preserved LV function, however, have a decreased heart rate variability compared to patients with IDC and preserved LV function. The prognostic significance of these findings will be determined prospectively in a large patient cohort at our institution.

摘要

本研究旨在比较冠心病患者(CAD,n = 49)和特发性扩张型心肌病患者(IDC,n = 130)的压力感受器敏感性和心率变异性,以此作为心脏自主神经张力的指标。在24小时动态心电图监测期间测定时域心率变异性,包括SDNN、SDANN和pNN50。使用去氧肾上腺素方法对压力反射敏感性进行无创分析。CAD患者与IDC患者之间的压力反射敏感性和心率变异性具有可比性(压力反射敏感性:6.1±3对6.9±5 ms/mmHg;SDNN:97±40对114±41 ms;SDANN:83±33对99±41 ms;pNN50:3.9±4对9.6±13 ms,所有比较P =无显著性差异)。同样,对左心室射血分数(LVEF)≤30%的患者进行亚组分析显示,IDC患者与CAD患者在压力感受器敏感性和心率变异性方面无显著差异。与LVEF>30%的IDC患者相比,LVEF>30%的CAD患者心率变异性降低,但压力反射敏感性未降低(压力反射敏感性:6.4±4对8.3±6 ms/mmHg,P =无显著性差异;SDNN:98±19对128±42 ms,P<0.05;SDANN:86±21对112±43 ms,P<0.05;pNN50:4.2±3对12.3±8 ms,P<0.05)。LVEF明显降低的患者,无论患有CAD还是IDC,其心脏自主神经张力的改变具有可比性。然而,与LVEF保留的IDC患者相比,LVEF保留的CAD患者心率变异性降低。这些发现的预后意义将在我们机构的一大组患者队列中进行前瞻性确定。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验