Pierce G R, Ptacek J T, Taylor B, Yee P L, Henderson C A, Lauventi H J, Bourdeau C M
Department of Psychology, Hamilton College, Clinton, New York 13323, USA.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Oct;75(4):1016-31. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.75.4.1016.
Two studies investigated the cross-temporal stability and cross-situational consistency of cognitive interference. In Study 1, 70 college students reported on the intrusive thoughts they experienced during 2 course examinations and a self-reflective task. In Study 2, 55 college athletes reported on intrusive thoughts following 2 course examinations and 2 regular season football games. Major findings were (a) cognitive interference showed both cross-temporal stability and cross-situational consistency, (b) it was predicted by a measure of dispositional intrusive thinking, (c) the link between cognitive interference and dispositional intrusive thinking was not accounted for by indices of depressive symptomatology and trait anxiety, and (d) the degree of cross-situational consistency of cognitive interference and the content of these intrusive thoughts were influenced by situational factors.
两项研究调查了认知干扰的跨时间稳定性和跨情境一致性。在研究1中，70名大学生报告了他们在两场课程考试和一项自我反思任务中经历的侵入性思维。在研究2中，55名大学生运动员报告了两场课程考试和两场常规赛足球比赛后的侵入性思维。主要研究结果为：（a）认知干扰表现出跨时间稳定性和跨情境一致性；（b）它可由一种特质性侵入性思维的测量指标预测；（c）认知干扰与特质性侵入性思维之间的联系不能用抑郁症状和特质焦虑指标来解释；（d）认知干扰的跨情境一致性程度以及这些侵入性思维的内容受到情境因素的影响。
