Suppr超能文献

两种不同的源自ProMACE-CytaBOM方案在晚期侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤中的疗效。GISL进行的一项多中心试验的最终报告。

Efficacy of two different ProMACE-CytaBOM derived regimens in advanced aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Final report of a multicenter trial conducted by GISL.

作者信息

Federico M, Clò V, Brugiatelli M, Carotenuto M, Gobbi P G, Vallisa D, Lombardo M, Avanzini P, Di Renzo N, Dini D, Baldini L, Silingardi V

机构信息

Cattedra e Divisione di Oncologia Medica, Università di Modena, Italy.

出版信息

Haematologica. 1998 Sep;83(9):800-11.

PMID:9825577
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of ProME(Epidoxorubicin)CE-CytaBOM (PE-C) and ProMI(Idarubicin)CE-CytaBOM (PI-C) in the treatment of adult patients with aggressive non Hodgkin's lymphoma in a multicenter randomized controlled trial performed by 18 centers of the Italian Lymphoma Study Group (GISL).

DESIGN AND METHODS

One hundred and twenty-eight and 122 patients were randomly assigned to receive either 6 courses of PE-C or PI-C, respectively. Some patients achieving complete remission with induction therapy participated in another randomized study comparing no further therapy versus maintenance therapy consisting of four blocks of two drugs.

RESULTS

The rate of CRs was 62% and 64% for patients treated with PE-C and PI-C, respectively (p = 0.51). The 5-year relapse-free survival was 60% for PE-C and 53% for PI-C (p = 0.29). The estimated relapse-free disease survival rates at 4 years were 75% for patients in the consolidation group and 57% for those in the observation group (p = 0.11). Patients alive in first complete remission 4 years after study entry were estimated to be 39% in the PE-C arm and 38% in the PI-C arm (p = 0.90). The 3-year and 5-year estimated survival rates were 61% and 55% for the PE-C group and 56% and 47% for the PI-C group (p = 0.26). Fatal toxicities occurred in 7 patients (2.9%) with active disease and in 4 patients (1.7%) in complete remission. Stage (p = 0.04), bulky disease (p = 0.02), serum LDH (p = 0.0006), serum albumin (p = 0.0051), hemoglobin (p = 0.0011), performance status (p = 0.0001), International prognostic index (p < 0.0001) and the index proposed by the French group G.E.L.A. (p < 0.0001) were of prognostic value. In a multivariate analysis (Cox regression model) alternatively IPI alone or G.E.L.A. index plus performance status emerged as independent prognostic factors.

INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS

The present study indicates that epirubicin and idarubicin in a combined chemotherapy regimen, have similar activities. The toxic profile also indicates the safety of both anthracyclines at the dosages employed, suggesting their possible dose escalation in a combined chemotherapy setting. PE-C and PI-C were both effective and feasible regimens in an outpatient setting, with acceptable cardiovascular toxicity. The trend toward a better outcome in patients undergoing consolidation therapy after the achievement of a complete remission, warrants further investigation.

摘要

背景与目的

在由意大利淋巴瘤研究组(GISL)的18个中心开展的一项多中心随机对照试验中,比较表柔比星(表阿霉素)CE - CytaBOM(PE - C)方案与伊达比星(去甲氧柔红霉素)CE - CytaBOM(PI - C)方案治疗侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤成年患者的疗效。

设计与方法

分别将128例和122例患者随机分配接受6个疗程的PE - C方案或PI - C方案治疗。部分诱导治疗后达到完全缓解的患者参与另一项随机研究,比较不再接受进一步治疗与接受由两种药物组成的四个疗程维持治疗的效果。

结果

接受PE - C方案和PI - C方案治疗的患者完全缓解率分别为62%和64%(p = 0.51)。PE - C方案的5年无复发生存率为60%,PI - C方案为53%(p = 0.29)。巩固治疗组患者4年无复发生病生存率估计为75%,观察组为57%(p = 0.11)。研究入组4年后处于首次完全缓解状态存活的患者,PE - C组估计为39%,PI - C组为38%(p = 0.90)。PE - C组3年和5年估计生存率分别为61%和55%,PI - C组为56%和47%(p = 0.26)。7例(2.9%)活动性疾病患者和4例(1.7%)完全缓解患者发生致命毒性反应。分期(p = 0.04)、大包块病变(p = 0.02)、血清乳酸脱氢酶(p = 0.0006)、血清白蛋白(p = 0.0051)、血红蛋白(p = 0.0011)、体能状态(p = 0.0001)、国际预后指数(p < 0.0001)以及法国G.E.L.A.组提出的指数(p < 0.0001)具有预后价值。在多因素分析(Cox回归模型)中,单独的国际预后指数(IPI)或G.E.L.A.指数加体能状态是独立的预后因素。

解读与结论

本研究表明,表柔比星和伊达比星在联合化疗方案中具有相似活性。毒性特征也表明两种蒽环类药物在所使用剂量下的安全性,提示在联合化疗中可能增加剂量。PE - C方案和PI - C方案在门诊环境中均有效且可行,心血管毒性可接受。完全缓解后接受巩固治疗的患者有更好预后的趋势,值得进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验