• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[冠心病的差异化介入治疗]

[Differential interventional therapy of coronary heart disease].

作者信息

Heintzen M P, Michel C J, Strauer B E

机构信息

Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik B Kardiologie, Pneumologie und Angiologie Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf.

出版信息

Z Kardiol. 1998;87 Suppl 2:157-65. doi: 10.1007/s003920050555.

DOI:10.1007/s003920050555
PMID:9827475
Abstract

Currently, catheter-based coronary therapy is performed using multiple interventional devices. Conventional balloon dilatation is still the dominating therapeutic modality with sufficient results in the majority of coronary lesions. Several alternative new devices were developed to improve acute results and long-term patency compared to balloon dilatation. With use of these devices (stents, coronary atherectomy, laser angioplasty or high speed rotablator) not every coronary lesion can be successfully treated, but several special indications for a differential indication of each of these systems have been found in randomized trials or clinical use. In this review, potential catheter-based strategies for a differential interventional treatment of patients with coronary artery disease are discussed.

摘要

目前,基于导管的冠状动脉治疗是使用多种介入设备进行的。传统的球囊扩张术仍然是主要的治疗方式,在大多数冠状动脉病变中都能取得足够的治疗效果。与球囊扩张术相比,人们开发了几种新型替代设备,以改善急性治疗效果和长期通畅率。使用这些设备(支架、冠状动脉旋切术、激光血管成形术或高速旋磨术)并不能成功治疗所有冠状动脉病变,但在随机试验或临床应用中已经发现了这些系统各自不同的特殊适应证。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了针对冠心病患者进行差异化介入治疗的潜在导管策略。

相似文献

1
[Differential interventional therapy of coronary heart disease].[冠心病的差异化介入治疗]
Z Kardiol. 1998;87 Suppl 2:157-65. doi: 10.1007/s003920050555.
2
Differences in restenosis propensity of devices for transluminal coronary intervention. A quantitative angiographic comparison of balloon angioplasty, directional atherectomy, stent implantation and excimer laser angioplasty. CARPORT, MERCATOR, MARCATOR, PARK, and BENESTENT Trial Groups.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗器械再狭窄倾向的差异。球囊血管成形术、定向旋切术、支架植入术和准分子激光血管成形术的定量血管造影比较。CARPORT、MERCATOR、MARCATOR、PARK和BENESTENT试验组。
Eur Heart J. 1995 Oct;16(10):1331-46. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060740.
3
Are residual stenoses after excimer laser angioplasty and coronary atherectomy due to inefficient or small devices? Comparison with balloon angioplasty.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Nov 15;22(6):1628-34. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90587-q.
4
New technologies in interventional cardiology.介入心脏病学中的新技术。
Curr Opin Cardiol. 1994 Jul;9(4):493-502. doi: 10.1097/00001573-199407000-00012.
5
[PTCA or alternative techniques? Balloon angioplasty remains dominant].
Z Kardiol. 1995;84 Suppl 2:43-52.
6
New device angioplasty: the impact on restenosis.新型器械血管成形术:对再狭窄的影响
Coron Artery Dis. 1993 Mar;4(3):243-53. doi: 10.1097/00019501-199303000-00004.
7
Evaluating new devices. Acute (in-hospital) results from the New Approaches to Coronary Intervention Registry.评估新设备。来自冠状动脉介入治疗新方法注册研究的急性(住院期间)结果。
Circulation. 1994 Jan;89(1):471-81. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.89.1.471.
8
Restenosis after coronary interventions and device specificity.冠状动脉介入术后再狭窄与器械特异性
Eur Heart J. 1995 Oct;16(10):1307-8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060732.
9
New methods of making blocked coronary arteries patent again.使阻塞的冠状动脉再次畅通的新方法。
BMJ. 1994 Sep 3;309(6954):579-83. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6954.579.
10
Problems in the evaluation of new devices for coronary intervention: what have we learned since 1989?冠状动脉介入新设备评估中的问题:自1989年以来我们学到了什么?
Am J Cardiol. 1997 Nov 20;80(10A):3K-9K. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00759-5.