• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

器械法、手法及联合皮下刮除法治疗腋臭的手术疗效对比研究

A comparative study of the surgical treatment of axillary osmidrosis by instrument, manual, and combined subcutaneous shaving procedures.

作者信息

Park D H, Kim T M, Han D G, Ahn K Y

机构信息

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Catholic University of Taegu Hyosung, College of Medicine, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Plast Surg. 1998 Nov;41(5):488-97. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199811000-00007.

DOI:10.1097/00000637-199811000-00007
PMID:9827951
Abstract

Between 1986 and 1996, 128 patients underwent surgery for axillary osmidrosis via en bloc removal of subcutaneous cellular tissue. The patients were followed for 6 months to 7 years (average follow-up, 25 months). The authors propose three categories in which they classified shaving procedures: instrumental shavings (N = 84), manual shavings (N = 96), and combined shaving procedures (N = 76). A modified Inaba's shaver was used in instrument shavings. Combined shaving is mixture of instrument and conventional manual shaving. All patients were asked to complete a questionnaire postoperatively. This follow-up demonstrated that 92.9% of patients who underwent instrument shaving, 95.8% of patients who underwent manual shaving, and 97.4% of patients who underwent combined shaving experienced no odor or occasional, very mild axillary odor postoperatively. Postoperative scar formation was either invisible or excellent in 92.9% of instrument shavings, and 92.1% of patients who underwent the combined procedure reported either a hairless axilla or a marked decrease of axillary hair. The total satisfaction rate in the combined procedure was 94.7%, which is a better result than the instrument (92.9%) and the manual (91.7%) shaving procedures. The wound complication rate per patient with the combined procedure was 13.2%. There was no scar contracture or limitation in arm abduction. The combined subcutaneous shaving procedure using the modified Inaba's shaver has the advantages of rapid and accurate shaving, low incidence of hematoma formation, enhanced wound healing, and easy postoperative care. Therefore, en bloc resection of subcutaneous cellular tissue by combined shaving is a viable option for treatment of axillary osmidrosis.

摘要

1986年至1996年间,128例患者通过整块切除皮下蜂窝组织接受了腋臭手术。对患者进行了6个月至7年的随访(平均随访25个月)。作者提出了三类剃须手术:器械剃须(N = 84)、手动剃须(N = 96)和联合剃须手术(N = 76)。器械剃须使用改良的稻叶剃须刀。联合剃须是器械剃须和传统手动剃须的混合方式。所有患者术后均被要求完成一份问卷。该随访表明,接受器械剃须的患者中有92.9%、接受手动剃须的患者中有95.8%以及接受联合剃须的患者中有97.4%术后无异味或仅有偶尔、非常轻微的腋下异味。在器械剃须患者中,92.9%的患者术后瘢痕形成不可见或效果极佳,接受联合手术的患者中有92.1%报告腋窝无毛或腋毛显著减少。联合手术的总满意率为94.7%,这一结果优于器械剃须(92.9%)和手动剃须(91.7%)手术。联合手术每位患者的伤口并发症发生率为13.2%。未出现瘢痕挛缩或手臂外展受限。使用改良稻叶剃须刀的联合皮下剃须手术具有剃须快速准确、血肿形成发生率低、伤口愈合加快以及术后护理简便等优点。因此,联合剃须整块切除皮下蜂窝组织是治疗腋臭的一种可行选择。

相似文献

1
A comparative study of the surgical treatment of axillary osmidrosis by instrument, manual, and combined subcutaneous shaving procedures.器械法、手法及联合皮下刮除法治疗腋臭的手术疗效对比研究
Ann Plast Surg. 1998 Nov;41(5):488-97. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199811000-00007.
2
What is the best method for treating osmidrosis?治疗腋臭的最佳方法是什么?
Ann Plast Surg. 2001 Sep;47(3):303-9. doi: 10.1097/00000637-200109000-00014.
3
Comparative Study of En Bloc Excision and Dermal Shaving in Treating Axillary Osmidrosis.全层切除与皮肤削除法治疗腋臭的对比研究。
Ann Plast Surg. 2022 Jul 1;89(1):72-76. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003054. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
4
Axillary osmidrosis treated by partial removal of the skin and subcutaneous tissue en bloc and apocrine gland subcision.通过整块切除皮肤和皮下组织以及大汗腺切开术治疗腋臭。
Int J Dermatol. 2001 Nov;40(11):714-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-4362.2001.01291.x.
5
Surgical subcision as a cost-effective and minimally invasive treatment for axillary osmidrosis.手术切除作为一种经济有效的微创治疗腋臭的方法。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2010 Mar;9(1):44-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-2165.2010.00477.x.
6
Surgical treatment of axillary osmidrosis: an analysis of 343 cases.腋臭的外科治疗:343例分析
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994 Aug;94(2):288-94. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199408000-00011.
7
Effectiveness and complications of subdermal excision of apocrine glands in 206 cases with axillary osmidrosis.206 例腋臭患者皮下切除顶泌汗腺的疗效及并发症。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010 Jun;63(6):1003-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.05.004. Epub 2009 Jun 7.
8
Very superficial ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty for the treatment of axillary osmidrosis.极浅表超声辅助脂肪抽吸术治疗腋臭
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2000 Jul-Aug;24(4):275-9. doi: 10.1007/s002660010045.
9
Minimally invasive surgery for axillary osmidrosis: combined operation with CO2 laser and subcutaneous tissue remover.腋臭的微创手术:二氧化碳激光与皮下组织切除器联合手术
Dermatol Surg. 1999 Nov;25(11):875-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.1999.99116.x.
10
Shortening of Incision by "Pinch and Turn-Over Technique" in the Treatment of Axillary Osmidrosis.“捏合翻转技术”缩短切口治疗腋臭。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019 Feb;43(1):267-277. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1263-2. Epub 2018 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Microbiota and Malodor-Etiology and Management.微生物群与异味——病因与管理。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Apr 20;21(8):2886. doi: 10.3390/ijms21082886.
2
Effectiveness and Complications of Improved Liposuction-Curettage Through Mini-Incisions for the Treatment of Axillary Osmidrosis.改良小切口吸脂刮除术治疗腋臭的疗效及并发症
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2017 Nov;25(4):234-241. doi: 10.1177/2292550317728038. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
3
Versajet-Assisted Hydraulic Epilation Through Small Incisions for Axillary Osmidrosis.经小切口Versajet辅助液压脱毛治疗腋臭
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018 Jun;42(3):617-624. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1097-y. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
4
[Dermatosurgical therapy of hyperhidrosis].[多汗症的皮肤外科治疗]
Hautarzt. 2013 Aug;64(8):577-84. doi: 10.1007/s00105-013-2544-y.
5
[Liposuction curettage versus Botox for axillary hyperhidrosis. A prospective study of the quality of life].[抽脂刮除术与肉毒杆菌毒素治疗腋窝多汗症。一项生活质量的前瞻性研究]
Chirurg. 2007 Apr;78(4):356-61. doi: 10.1007/s00104-006-1288-y.