Suppr超能文献

非诺贝特与洛伐他汀治疗原发性IIa型或IIb型高脂血症患者的疗效及安全性比较。

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of fenofibrate and lovastatin in patients with primary type IIa or IIb hyperlipidaemia.

作者信息

Gholami K, Tavakoli N, Maleki M, Shafiee A

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, The Medical Sciences University of Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Clin Pharm Ther. 1998 Jun;23(3):213-21. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2710.1998.00154.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of fenofibrate and lovastatin in patients with type IIa or IIb hyperlipidaemia.

METHODS

One hundred patients entered this single-centre, open, comparative trial. After 2 months of diet therapy, 33 patients (16 with type IIa and 17 with type IIb hyperlipidaemia) were randomized to treatment for 3 months with a single daily 300 mg dose of fenofibrate or 20 mg of lovastatin.

RESULTS

After 3 months of drug therapy, fenofibrate and lovastatin produced significant reductions in levels of total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in type IIa hyperlipidaemia. In type IIb, the levels of total cholesterol were significantly decreased by both drugs, but only lovastatin significantly reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in these patients. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were significantly increased by lovastatin in type IIa and fenofibrate in type IIb. Fenofibrate decreased total triglyceride levels in both types of hyperlipidaemia significantly more effectively than lovastatin. The most important and commonly observed adverse effects in the fenofibrate group were dermatological events (three patients), myalgia (two patients) and asymptomatic increase in aminotransferase values (nine patients), while in the lovastatin group cardiovascular events (five patients) were the most common. All five patients had coronary heart disease at baseline. In general terms, both drugs were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparison between fenofibrate and lovastatin after 3 months of drug therapy in both types IIa and IIb hyperlipidaemia demonstrated that both drugs produced similar reductions in levels of total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. However, fenofibrate decreased total triglyceride levels in both types of hyperlipidaemia, more effectively than lovastatin. Thus, fenofibrate is suitable for both primary hypercholesterolaemia and combined hyperlipidaemia.

摘要

目的

评估并比较非诺贝特与洛伐他汀治疗IIa型或IIb型高脂血症患者的疗效及安全性。

方法

100例患者进入这项单中心、开放性、对照试验。经过2个月的饮食治疗后,33例患者(16例IIa型和17例IIb型高脂血症患者)被随机分为两组,分别接受为期3个月的治疗,一组每日单次服用300mg非诺贝特,另一组每日单次服用20mg洛伐他汀。

结果

经过3个月的药物治疗,非诺贝特和洛伐他汀均可使IIa型高脂血症患者的总胆固醇和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平显著降低。在IIb型高脂血症患者中,两种药物均可使总胆固醇水平显著下降,但只有洛伐他汀能显著降低这些患者的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平。洛伐他汀可使IIa型高脂血症患者的高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平显著升高,非诺贝特可使IIb型高脂血症患者的高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平显著升高。非诺贝特降低两种类型高脂血症患者总甘油三酯水平的效果明显优于洛伐他汀。非诺贝特组最常见且重要的不良反应为皮肤事件(3例患者)、肌痛(2例患者)和无症状的转氨酶值升高(9例患者),而洛伐他汀组最常见的不良反应是心血管事件(5例患者)。所有5例患者基线时均患有冠心病。总体而言,两种药物耐受性良好。

结论

对IIa型和IIb型高脂血症患者进行3个月药物治疗后,非诺贝特与洛伐他汀比较显示,两种药物降低总胆固醇和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平的效果相似。然而,非诺贝特降低两种类型高脂血症患者总甘油三酯水平的效果优于洛伐他汀。因此,非诺贝特适用于原发性高胆固醇血症和混合型高脂血症。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验