Baines D, Whynes D
The Health Economics Facility, Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, UK.
J Clin Pharm Ther. 1998 Jun;23(3):229-34. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2710.1998.00157.x.
To examine the variation in prescribing costs explained by the Age, Sex and Temporary Resident Originated Prescribing Unit (ASTRO-PU) and its replacement, the ASTRO (97)-PU, in order to determine the appropriateness of their use in the setting of prescribing budgets in English general practice.
Linear regression analysis was used to analyse routinely collected patient and prescribing data from one English health authority (Lincolnshire Health) for the fiscal year 1995.
The goodness-of-fit of the regression models constructed varied according to whether practices had dispensing status (i.e. rural practices that have permission to dispense drugs to their own patients as a means of compensating for the lack of pharmacies in such areas), with the ASTRO-PU and ASTROP(97)-PU explaining a higher proportion of the variation in prescribing costs amongst practices with such status.
This paper draws two main conclusions. First, the weights embodied in the ASTRO-PU and the ASTRO(97)-PU may have been biased by the number of dispensing practices sampled during their construction. Second, the denominators may be more applicable to dispensing practices, implying that primary care groups may need to follow the principle of 'local flexibility' during the budget-setting process.
研究由年龄、性别和临时居民来源处方单位(ASTRO-PU)及其替代单位ASTRO(97)-PU所解释的处方成本差异,以确定它们在英格兰全科医疗处方预算设定中的适用性。
采用线性回归分析,对来自一个英格兰卫生当局(林肯郡卫生)1995财政年度的常规收集的患者和处方数据进行分析。
所构建的回归模型的拟合优度因诊所是否具有配药地位(即有权向自己的患者配药以弥补此类地区药房不足的农村诊所)而异,ASTRO-PU和ASTROP(97)-PU在具有此类地位的诊所中能解释更高比例的处方成本差异。
本文得出两个主要结论。第一,ASTRO-PU和ASTRO(97)-PU所包含的权重可能在构建过程中因抽样的配药诊所数量而产生偏差。第二,分母可能更适用于配药诊所,这意味着初级保健团体在预算设定过程中可能需要遵循“局部灵活性”原则。