Greenblatt D J, Harmatz J S, von Moltke L L, Ehrenberg B L, Harrel L, Corbett K, Counihan M, Graf J A, Darwish M, Mertzanis P, Martin P T, Cevallos W H, Shader R I
Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Tufts University School of Medicine, New England Medical Center Hospital, Boston 02111, USA.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1998 Nov;64(5):553-61. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9236(98)90139-4.
This study evaluated the relationship of dose, plasma concentration, and time to the pharmacodynamics of zaleplon and zolpidem, 2 structurally distinct benzodiazepine receptor agonists.
Ten healthy male volunteers received single oral doses of placebo, 10 mg zaleplon, 20 mg zaleplon, 10 mg zolpidem, and 20 mg zolpidem in a double-blind, 5-condition crossover study, with 48 hours elapsing between trials. Plasma drug concentrations and pharmacodynamic effects were measured during the 8 to 24 hours after administration.
Kinetics of zaleplon and zolpidem were not significantly related to dose. However, zaleplon had more rapid elimination (apparent elimination half-life [t1/2] of 1 hour) and higher apparent oral clearance (approximately 4300 mL/min) than zolpidem (t1/2, 2.0 to 2.2 hours; apparent oral clearance, 340 to 380 mL/min). Active treatments produced pharmacodynamic effects consistent with benzodiazepine agonist activity: self- and observer-rated sedation, impairment of digit symbol substitution test (DSST) performance, impaired memory, and increased electroencephalographic activity in the beta frequency range. The overall order of agonist potency was as follows: placebo < 10 mg zaleplon < 20 mg zaleplon < 10 mg zolpidem < 20 mg zolpidem; on a number of measures, 20 mg zaleplon was comparable to 10 mg zolpidem. Quantitative effects of zolpidem 20 mg far exceeded those of other treatments. Dynamic effects of both drugs were significantly related to plasma concentration.
Benzodiazepine agonist effects of zaleplon and zolpidem were dose and concentration dependent. At the usual clinically effective hypnotic dose (10 mg of either drug), agonist effects of zolpidem exceeded those of zaleplon.
本研究评估了两种结构不同的苯二氮䓬受体激动剂扎来普隆和唑吡坦的剂量、血浆浓度及时间与药效学之间的关系。
在一项双盲、五条件交叉研究中,10名健康男性志愿者分别接受单次口服安慰剂、10毫克扎来普隆、20毫克扎来普隆、10毫克唑吡坦和20毫克唑吡坦,试验之间间隔48小时。在给药后8至24小时内测量血浆药物浓度和药效学效应。
扎来普隆和唑吡坦的动力学与剂量无显著相关性。然而,扎来普隆的消除速度更快(表观消除半衰期[t1/2]为1小时),表观口服清除率更高(约4300毫升/分钟),而唑吡坦的t1/2为2.0至2.2小时,表观口服清除率为340至380毫升/分钟。活性治疗产生了与苯二氮䓬激动剂活性一致的药效学效应:自我和观察者评定的镇静作用、数字符号替换测试(DSST)表现受损、记忆受损以及β频率范围内脑电图活动增加。激动剂效力的总体顺序如下:安慰剂<10毫克扎来普隆<20毫克扎来普隆<10毫克唑吡坦<20毫克唑吡坦;在多项指标上,20毫克扎来普隆与10毫克唑吡坦相当。20毫克唑吡坦的定量效应远远超过其他治疗。两种药物的动态效应均与血浆浓度显著相关。
扎来普隆和唑吡坦的苯二氮䓬激动剂效应具有剂量和浓度依赖性。在通常的临床有效催眠剂量(两种药物均为10毫克)下,唑吡坦的激动剂效应超过扎来普隆。