Hauw J J, Seilhean D, Colle M A, Hogenhuys J, Duyckaerts C
Laboratoire de Neuropathologie R. Escourolle, INSERM U 360 et 106, Association Claude Bernard, Université Pierre et Marie Curie (Paris VI), Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière.
Rev Neurol (Paris). 1998;154 Suppl 2:S50-64.
The number of neuropathological markers used for the diagnosis of degenerative dementias is rapidly increasing, and this is somewhat confusing: some lesions described a long time ago, such as ballooned cells, proved to be less specific than they were supposed to be; this is also the case for Lewy bodies, that have been recognised in a larger spectrum of disorders than thought a few years ago. On the contrary, for an increasing number of neuropathologists, Pick bodies are now mandatory for the diagnosis of Pick disease, and this contrasts with the prevalent opinions of the late sixties or seventies. There are a number of reasons for the changing significance of neuropathological markers. Three of them can be easily identified: 1) the burst of immunohistochemistry into neuropathology allowed an easier recognition, a better delineation and new pathophysiological approaches to old lesions, and a dramatic increase in the description of new markers, especially in glial cells; 2) in some conditions characterized by the number and distribution of some lesions rather than by their mere presence, such as aging and Alzheimer disease, a better neuroanatomical point of view permitted new insights into the concept of disease versus age-related changes; 3) more accurate clinicopathologic correlations showed clearly the need of grouping or lumping together some entities: for example, obvious relationship aroused between progressive supranuclear palsy and corticobasal degeneration; in contrast, distinguishing different disorders in the frontal lobe dementias grouped together into "Pick disease" was felt necessary. This review summarizes the main criteria for identification, and the presumed meaning of the chief markers indicating the presence of abnormally phosphorylated tau proteins, A beta peptides, and PrP proteins. Abnormally phosphorylated tau proteins can be stored in the neurons, and participate in the constitution of many lesions (neurofibrillary tangles, neuropil threads, abnormal processes of the crown of neuritic senile plaques, Pick bodies, granulo-vacuolar degeneration, argyrophilic grains). When seen in neuroglia, they are the chief constituents of various lesions that affect mainly astrocytes (abnormal tufts of fibres, astrocytic plaques, thorn-shaped astrocytes, spiny astrocytes) and also oligodendrocytes (oligodendroglial threads and coils, glial cytoplasmic inclusions). A beta peptides, in "preamyloid" and amyloid conformations, can be seen in the extracellular space (plaques, of the neuritic or non-neuritic varieties, diffuse, focal and granular deposits) and in the vascular walls (amyloid angiopathies). Some PrP deposits are also of the amyloid variety (kuru type, multicentric or florid plaques), but immunohistochemistry, far more sensitive than conventional studies, revealed a number of other lesions (perivacuolar, neuronal, "synaptic" deposits...). Numerous markers are easily detected by ubiquitin immunohistochemistry. Lewy bodies, Pick bodies, neurofibrillary tangles had already be identified by other methods. In contrast, some ubiquitin-positive inclusions are shown, by this technique only, in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and other conditions which were thus related to this disease. Finally, this review deals with two classic markers, ballooned cells ("Pick cells") and spongiosis seen in disorders due to non conventional agents or prions (spongiform encephalopathies).
用于诊断退行性痴呆的神经病理学标志物数量正在迅速增加,这在一定程度上令人困惑:一些很久以前描述的病变,如气球样细胞,事实证明其特异性不如预期;路易小体也是如此,现在已认识到它出现在比几年前认为的更广泛的疾病谱中。相反,对于越来越多的神经病理学家来说,现在诊断皮克病必须有皮克小体,这与六七十年代的普遍观点形成了对比。神经病理学标志物的意义发生变化有多种原因。其中三个原因很容易确定:1)免疫组织化学在神经病理学中的应用使得对旧病变的识别更容易、描述更清晰,并带来了新的病理生理学研究方法,新标志物的描述急剧增加,尤其是在神经胶质细胞方面;2)在某些以某些病变的数量和分布而非仅仅其存在为特征的情况下,如衰老和阿尔茨海默病,更好的神经解剖学观点为疾病与年龄相关变化的概念带来了新的见解;3)更准确的临床病理相关性清楚地表明需要对一些实体进行分组或合并:例如,进行性核上性麻痹和皮质基底节变性之间出现了明显的关系;相反,人们认为有必要区分归类为“皮克病”的额叶痴呆中的不同疾病。本综述总结了主要的识别标准,以及指示异常磷酸化tau蛋白、Aβ肽和PrP蛋白存在的主要标志物的假定意义。异常磷酸化的tau蛋白可储存在神经元中,并参与许多病变的构成(神经原纤维缠结、神经毡丝、神经炎性老年斑冠部的异常突起、皮克小体、颗粒空泡变性、嗜银颗粒)。当在神经胶质细胞中看到时,它们是主要影响星形胶质细胞的各种病变(纤维异常簇、星形胶质细胞斑、棘状星形胶质细胞、刺状星形胶质细胞)以及少突胶质细胞(少突胶质细胞丝和线圈、胶质细胞质内含物)的主要成分。处于“淀粉样前体”和淀粉样构象的Aβ肽可见于细胞外空间(神经炎性或非神经炎性斑块、弥漫性、局灶性和颗粒状沉积物)以及血管壁(淀粉样血管病)。一些PrP沉积物也是淀粉样类型(库鲁病型、多中心或 florid 斑块),但免疫组织化学比传统研究敏感得多,揭示了许多其他病变(空泡周围、神经元、“突触”沉积物……)。许多标志物可通过泛素免疫组织化学轻松检测到。路易小体、皮克小体、神经原纤维缠结已经通过其他方法鉴定出来。相比之下,一些泛素阳性内含物仅通过这种技术在肌萎缩侧索硬化症和其他与该疾病相关的病症中显示出来。最后,本综述讨论了两种经典标志物,即气球样细胞(“皮克细胞”)和在非传统病原体或朊病毒引起的疾病(海绵状脑病)中出现的海绵状变性。