• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对参与临床试验的满意度。

Patient satisfaction with clinical trial participation.

作者信息

Verheggen F W, Nieman F H, Reerink E, Kok G J

机构信息

Quality Council, University Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 1998 Aug;10(4):319-30. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/10.4.319.

DOI:10.1093/intqhc/10.4.319
PMID:9835248
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess satisfaction of patients who participate in clinical trials requiring informed consent and to analyse factors determining patient satisfaction.

SETTING

The survey took place in 26 clinical trials at the University Hospital Maastricht (azM), The Netherlands.

DESIGN AND STUDY PARTICIPANTS

A personal interview and telephone questionnaire were used consecutively (n= 135; 135 out of 172=78.5% response rate) to measure patient's expectancies before starting the trial during the informed consent procedure and to evaluate aspects of trial participation. An additional control group of 34 patients was interviewed only by telephone (100% response).

MEASURES

Satisfaction was assessed in two distinct ways: first, by measuring the patient's subjective evaluation of several aspects of trial participation; secondly, by comparing prior expectations and subsequent evaluations. Patient satisfaction was subdivided with respect to medical-technical, interpersonal and organizational aspects of trial participation. Changes in patient's health and illness perceptions were regarded as confounding factors in the relationship between satisfaction and its possible causes.

RESULTS

Although patient satisfaction was quite high, dissatisfaction with aspects of trial participation became apparent when both prior expectations and subsequent evaluations were compared with each other.

CONCLUSION

Prior expectations and general attitudes towards medical care and research before entering the trial have an impact on satisfaction with aspects of trial participation (10-20% explained variance). No linear relationship was found between perceived improvements in health and illness conditions and patient satisfaction with trial participation.

摘要

目的

评估参与需要知情同意的临床试验的患者的满意度,并分析决定患者满意度的因素。

设置

该调查在荷兰马斯特里赫特大学医学中心(azM)的26项临床试验中进行。

设计与研究参与者

采用个人访谈和电话问卷的方式(n = 135;172人中的135人,回复率为78.5%),在知情同意程序中测量患者在开始试验前的期望,并评估试验参与的各个方面。另外一个由34名患者组成的对照组仅接受电话访谈(回复率100%)。

测量方法

通过两种不同方式评估满意度:第一,通过测量患者对试验参与几个方面的主观评价;第二,通过比较先前期望和后续评价。患者满意度根据试验参与的医疗技术、人际和组织方面进行细分。患者对健康和疾病认知的变化被视为满意度与其可能原因之间关系的混杂因素。

结果

尽管患者满意度相当高,但当将先前期望和后续评价相互比较时,对试验参与方面的不满就变得明显了。

结论

进入试验前对医疗护理和研究的先前期望及总体态度会影响对试验参与各方面的满意度(解释方差为10 - 20%)。在健康和疾病状况的感知改善与患者对试验参与的满意度之间未发现线性关系。

相似文献

1
Patient satisfaction with clinical trial participation.患者对参与临床试验的满意度。
Int J Qual Health Care. 1998 Aug;10(4):319-30. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/10.4.319.
2
Patient experiences in retinal trials: a cross-sectional study.视网膜试验中的患者体验:一项横断面研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2015 Jul 23;15:80. doi: 10.1186/s12886-015-0071-6.
3
Understanding the decisions of cancer clinical trial participants to enter research studies: factors associated with informed consent, patient satisfaction, and decisional regret.理解癌症临床试验参与者参与研究的决策:与知情同意、患者满意度和决策后悔相关的因素。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Oct;63(1-2):104-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.09.006. Epub 2005 Oct 19.
4
Determinants of patient participation in clinical studies requiring informed consent: why patients enter a clinical trial.需要知情同意的临床研究中患者参与的决定因素:患者参与临床试验的原因。
Patient Educ Couns. 1998 Oct;35(2):111-25. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(98)00060-3.
5
Ethical aspects of clinical trials: the attitudes of participants in two non-cancer trials.临床试验的伦理问题:两项非癌症试验参与者的态度
J Intern Med. 2000 Dec;248(6):463-74. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2796.2000.00755.x.
6
The views of patients and healthy volunteers on participation in clinical trials: an exploratory survey study.患者和健康志愿者对参与临床试验的看法:一项探索性调查研究。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 Jul;33(4):611-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.02.018. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
7
Comparing Patients' Opinions on the Hospital Discharge Process Collected With a Self-Reported Questionnaire Completed Via the Internet or Through a Telephone Survey: An Ancillary Study of the SENTIPAT Randomized Controlled Trial.比较通过互联网完成的自我报告问卷或电话调查收集的患者对医院出院流程的意见:SENTIPAT随机对照试验的一项辅助研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 24;17(6):e158. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4379.
8
Consent for Anesthesia Clinical Trials on the Day of Surgery: Patient Attitudes and Perceptions.手术当天麻醉临床试验的知情同意:患者的态度和认知
Anesthesiology. 2016 Jun;124(6):1246-55. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001107.
9
Determinants of informed consent in a cataract surgery clinical trial: why patients participate.白内障手术临床试验中知情同意的决定因素:患者为何参与。
Can J Ophthalmol. 2012 Apr;47(2):118-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2012.01.006.
10
Are subjects satisfied with the informed consent process? A survey of research participants.受试者对知情同意过程是否满意?一项针对研究参与者的调查。
J Rheumatol. 2003 Apr;30(4):815-24.

引用本文的文献

1
What research participants say about their research experiences in Empowering the Participant Voice: Outcomes and actionable data.研究参与者对他们在“增强参与者声音:成果与可操作数据”中的研究经历有何看法。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jan 10;9(1):e43. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.3. eCollection 2025.
2
A non-parametric approach to predict the recruitment for randomized clinical trials: an example in elderly inpatient settings.一种用于预测随机临床试验入组的非参数方法:老年住院患者环境中的一个实例。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Aug 29;24(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02314-2.
3
Community Engagement Strategies for Underrepresented Racial and Ethnic Populations.
针对代表性不足的种族和族裔群体的社区参与策略
Mayo Clin Proc. 2024 Jan;99(1):159-171. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2023.07.015.
4
The mediating effect of shared decision-making in enhancing patient satisfaction with participation in cancer clinical trials.共同决策在提高患者对参与癌症临床试验满意度方面的中介作用。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2023 Jun 23;10(8):100265. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100265. eCollection 2023 Aug.
5
Gathering the Stakeholder's Perspective: Experiences and Opportunities in Rare Genetic Disease Research.收集利益相关者的观点:罕见遗传病研究的经验和机会。
Genes (Basel). 2023 Jan 7;14(1):169. doi: 10.3390/genes14010169.
6
Understanding factors contributing to participant satisfaction in stroke walking recovery clinical trials.了解影响中风步行恢复临床试验中参与者满意度的因素。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2022 Jun 11;28:100945. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100945. eCollection 2022 Aug.
7
Is staff consistency important to parents' satisfaction in a longitudinal study of children at risk for type 1 diabetes: the TEDDY study.在一项对 1 型糖尿病高危儿童的纵向研究中,员工的一致性对家长的满意度重要吗?TEDDY 研究。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2022 Jan 10;22(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12902-021-00929-w.
8
Patient and Caregiver Experiences of Participating in Parkinson's Disease Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.患者和照护者参与帕金森病临床试验的体验:定性研究的系统评价。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2022 Feb 22;37(3):654-676. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acab083.
9
Satisfaction and perceptions of research participants in clinical and translational studies: An urban multi-institution with CTSA.临床与转化研究中研究参与者的满意度与认知:一个拥有临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)的城市多机构研究
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Mar 6;4(4):317-322. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.20.
10
Giving Voice to Clinical Study Participants: Development and Deployment of Sequential Patient Experience Surveys for Global Clinical Studies.为临床研究参与者发声:全球临床研究中连续患者体验调查的开发和应用。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Sep;54(5):1001-1009. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00115-5. Epub 2020 Jan 21.