• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为临床研究参与者发声:全球临床研究中连续患者体验调查的开发和应用。

Giving Voice to Clinical Study Participants: Development and Deployment of Sequential Patient Experience Surveys for Global Clinical Studies.

机构信息

UCB Pharma, 8010 Arco Corporate Drive, Raleigh, NC, 27617, USA.

Accelerated Enrollment Solutions, Pharmaceutical Product Development, LLC, Wake Forest, NC, USA.

出版信息

Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Sep;54(5):1001-1009. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00115-5. Epub 2020 Jan 21.

DOI:10.1007/s43441-020-00115-5
PMID:31965539
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7458896/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Biopharmaceutical companies are piloting patient experience surveys (PES) to help enhance patient satisfaction with clinical studies. However, most PES have been conducted at study close-out, which can hinder recall and responsiveness, and at a limited number of sites, which restricts their applicability to global studies. Our aim was to investigate the feasibility of developing sequential PES, which would be deployed globally, and to provide practical recommendations based on our real-world experience.

METHODS

To develop sequential PES (introductory, interim, close-out), we customized a previously developed patient experience close-out survey. Extensive input was gained from multiple stakeholders (e.g., survey experts, patient advisors, psychometricians, clinical trialists, lawyers). To deploy the PES in global studies, we prepared PES-specific ethics committee submissions, training materials (e.g., slides, videos), and PES invitation aids (postcards, digital app reminders).

RESULTS

Developing and deploying sequential PES in global clinical studies was feasible. The 3-part online PES (25 to 37 questions per survey) passed health literacy testing. To facilitate benchmarking, the PES included core questions (including a Net Promoter Score question). The PES gained ethics approval and was deployed globally in 2017-2018 in 12 phase 2 and 3 clinical studies in North America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific. Based on the real-world insights gained and the challenges encountered, we have made recommendations for PES.

CONCLUSIONS

Our practical recommendations on the development and deployment of sequential global PES may assist others to implement PES efficiently and effectively, allowing them to gain feedback from patients globally during clinical studies.

摘要

背景

生物制药公司正在试行患者体验调查(PES),以帮助提高患者对临床研究的满意度。然而,大多数 PES 都是在研究结束时进行的,这可能会阻碍回忆和响应能力,而且只在有限的几个地点进行,这限制了它们在全球研究中的适用性。我们的目的是调查开发顺序 PES 的可行性,这种 PES 将在全球范围内部署,并根据我们的实际经验提供实用建议。

方法

为了开发顺序 PES(介绍性、中期、结束),我们定制了以前开发的患者体验结束调查。从多个利益相关者(例如,调查专家、患者顾问、心理测量学家、临床试验人员、律师)获得了广泛的投入。为了在全球研究中部署 PES,我们准备了特定于 PES 的伦理委员会提交材料、培训材料(例如,幻灯片、视频)和 PES 邀请辅助工具(明信片、数字应用程序提醒)。

结果

在全球临床研究中开发和部署顺序 PES 是可行的。三部分在线 PES(每调查 25 至 37 个问题)通过了健康素养测试。为了便于基准测试,PES 包括核心问题(包括净推荐值问题)。PES 获得了伦理批准,并于 2017-2018 年在北美、欧洲和亚太地区的 12 项 2 期和 3 期临床研究中全球部署。根据实际经验获得的见解和遇到的挑战,我们对 PES 提出了建议。

结论

我们关于顺序全球 PES 的开发和部署的实用建议可能有助于其他人高效有效地实施 PES,使他们能够在临床研究期间从全球患者那里获得反馈。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9422/7458896/d22405763fd6/43441_2020_115_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9422/7458896/d22405763fd6/43441_2020_115_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9422/7458896/d22405763fd6/43441_2020_115_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Giving Voice to Clinical Study Participants: Development and Deployment of Sequential Patient Experience Surveys for Global Clinical Studies.为临床研究参与者发声:全球临床研究中连续患者体验调查的开发和应用。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Sep;54(5):1001-1009. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00115-5. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
2
It Only Takes a Minute: The Development and Implementation of a Patient Experience Survey in Radiation Therapy.只需一分钟:放射治疗患者体验调查的开发与实施
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2019 Mar;50(1):5-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2018.07.006. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
3
Athletic Training Student Core Competency Implementation During Patient Encounters.运动员训练学生在患者就诊期间的核心能力实施情况。
J Athl Train. 2018 Mar;53(3):282-291. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-314-16. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
4
Is Real-Time Feedback of Burn-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Settings Practical and Useful? A Pilot Study Implementing the Young Adult Burn Outcome Questionnaire.临床环境中烧伤特异性患者报告结局测量的实时反馈是否实用且有用?一项实施青年成人烧伤结局问卷的试点研究。
J Burn Care Res. 2016 Jan-Feb;37(1):64-74. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000287.
5
Patient Uptake, Experience, and Satisfaction Using Web-Based and Face-to-Face Hearing Health Services: Process Evaluation Study.使用基于网络和面对面听力健康服务的患者接受度、体验及满意度:过程评估研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Mar 20;22(3):e15875. doi: 10.2196/15875.
6
Taking Aim at Asthma Around the World: Global Results of the Asthma Insight and Management Survey in the Asia-Pacific Region, Latin America, Europe, Canada, and the United States.瞄准全球哮喘:亚太地区、拉丁美洲、欧洲、加拿大和美国的哮喘洞察与管理调查全球结果。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015 Sep-Oct;3(5):734-42.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2015.04.013. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
7
Global estimates of HIV infections and AIDS cases: 1991.1991年全球艾滋病毒感染和艾滋病病例估计数。
AIDS. 1991;5 Suppl 2:S57-61. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199101001-00009.
8
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
9
Accessibility information in New Delhi for "EaseAccess" Android-based app for persons with disability: an observational study.针对残疾人士的基于安卓系统的“轻松访问”应用程序在新德里的可访问性信息:一项观察性研究。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019 Oct;14(7):645-662. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1471743. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
10
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.

引用本文的文献

1
"There was No Opportunity to Express Good or Bad": Perspectives From Patient Focus Groups on Patient Experience in Clinical Trials.“没有机会表达好或坏”:患者焦点小组对临床试验中患者体验的看法
J Patient Exp. 2024 Mar 13;11:23743735241237684. doi: 10.1177/23743735241237684. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring the Impact of Patient Engagement and Patient Centricity in Clinical Research and Development.衡量患者参与和以患者为中心在临床研究与开发中的影响。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Jan;54(1):103-116. doi: 10.1007/s43441-019-00034-0. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
2
Global Public Attitudes About Clinical Research and Patient Experiences With Clinical Trials.全球公众对临床研究的态度和患者参与临床试验的体验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Oct 5;1(6):e182969. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.2969.
3
EUPATI Guidance for Patient Involvement in Medicines Research and Development (R&D); Guidance for Pharmaceutical Industry-Led Medicines R&D.
EUPATI患者参与药物研发(R&D)指南;制药行业主导的药物研发指南。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Oct 9;5:270. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00270. eCollection 2018.
4
Optimizing the Use of Electronic Data Sources in Clinical Trials: The Landscape, Part 1.优化临床试验中电子数据源的使用:现状,第1部分。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2016 Nov;50(6):682-696. doi: 10.1177/2168479016670689. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
5
Value of Developing Plain Language Summaries of Scientific and Clinical Articles: A Survey of Patients and Physicians.撰写科学与临床文章的简明语言摘要的价值:一项针对患者和医生的调查
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018 Jul;52(4):474-481. doi: 10.1177/2168479017738723. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
6
The Rules of Engagement: CTTI Recommendations for Successful Collaborations Between Sponsors and Patient Groups Around Clinical Trials.参与规则:CTTI 关于申办方与患者群体围绕临床试验开展成功合作的建议
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018 Mar;52(2):206-213. doi: 10.1177/2168479017720247. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
7
Making Patient Engagement a Reality.实现患者参与。
Patient. 2018 Feb;11(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0264-6.
8
Trial watch: Trends in clinical trial design complexity.试验观察:临床试验设计复杂性的趋势
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017 May;16(5):307. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2017.65. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
9
Clinical trials from the patient perspective: survey in an online patient community.从患者角度看临床试验:在线患者社区调查
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb 27;17(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2090-x.
10
Culture and Process Change as a Priority for Patient Engagement in Medicines Development.将文化与流程变革作为患者参与药物研发的优先事项。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2017 Jan;51(1):29-38. doi: 10.1177/2168479016659104. Epub 2016 Aug 20.