Bonichon F, Courtial F, Blanc-Vincent M P
Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux.
Bull Cancer. 1998 Oct;85(10):867-85.
The aim of this paper is to describe: (1) different times where we need to search and to analyse informations and documents in cancer field; (2) the literature process conducting to literature review. It includes, from the formulated question to its answer, the searching of relevant papers, the critical reading of selected papers, the inclusion of clinical research data, or even the elaboration of next research programs which will lead to new papers; (3) different actual means, specially electronic means, to search and select papers: different databases on line or on CD-ROM (Medline, Embase, Cancerlit, Pascal, Toxline, Bioethics, etc.), searching techniques adapted to cancer field, technical equipment required; (4) critical reading of selected papers. It is very easy to obtain lists of hundreds or even thousands of references, and simple rules for selection are needed for entirely reading only a limited number of relevant papers. A compromise is often difficult to find between exhaustivity and limited time we have to search and analyse literature. Synthesis of informations collected in evidence-based comprehensive reviews are useful for helping doctors to implement research results in their treatment practice.
(1)在癌症领域我们需要搜索和分析信息及文献的不同时机;(2)进行文献综述的文献过程。它包括从提出问题到得出答案,搜索相关论文、批判性阅读所选论文、纳入临床研究数据,甚至制定将产生新论文的后续研究计划;(3)搜索和选择论文的不同现有手段,特别是电子手段:不同的在线或光盘数据库(医学索引数据库、荷兰医学文摘数据库、癌症文献数据库、帕斯卡数据库、毒理学在线数据库、生物伦理学数据库等)、适用于癌症领域的搜索技术、所需的技术设备;(4)所选论文的批判性阅读。很容易获得数百甚至数千条参考文献列表,而要仅完整阅读有限数量的相关论文,就需要简单的选择规则。在详尽性和我们搜索与分析文献的有限时间之间往往很难找到折中的办法。循证综合综述中收集的信息综合有助于医生在治疗实践中应用研究成果。