Smedley J, Inskip H, Cooper C, Coggon D
Medical Research Council Environmental Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, United Kingdom.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Nov 15;23(22):2422-6. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199811150-00012.
Longitudinal study.
To assess the natural history of low back pain.
Most episodes of low back pain resolve or improve within a few weeks, but chronic or recurrent symptoms are common. Previous studies of natural history have usually relied on people's long-term recall of symptoms, or they have been limited to patients seeking clinical care.
Nurses (1,165 women) completed a baseline questionnaire and up to eight follow-up questionnaires 3 months apart. Each questionnaire asked whether they had experienced low back pain in the past month. One-month prevalences of pain at specified follow-ups were calculated according to histories of pain reported on earlier questionnaires.
The 1-month prevalence of low back pain at individual follow-ups ranged from 16% to 19%. Of 906 women who completed the baseline questionnaire and at least three follow-up questionnaires, 38 (4.2%) reported pain every time they returned a questionnaire, and 190 (21.0%) reported pain on at least three occasions. The presence or absence of low back pain at baseline was highly predictive of future pain throughout follow-up. The longer that back pain was consistently reported, the more likely it was to be present at the next follow-up. Later risk was lowest in women who reported no back pain at baseline or either of the first two follow-ups. Back pain carried a worse prognosis if it was disabling or associated with sciatica.
Our results confirm the importance of back pain duration and the occurrence of associated disability and sciatica as predictors of future symptoms, and allow more reliable quantification of the natural history of back pain in women of working age. In the absence of other information, the differentials in risk associated with a person's history of back pain appear to remain constant for a period of at least 2 years.
纵向研究。
评估腰痛的自然病程。
大多数腰痛发作在几周内缓解或改善,但慢性或复发性症状很常见。以往关于自然病程的研究通常依赖于人们对症状的长期回忆,或者仅限于寻求临床治疗的患者。
护士(1165名女性)完成一份基线问卷,并每隔3个月完成多达八份随访问卷。每份问卷询问她们在过去一个月是否经历过腰痛。根据早期问卷中报告的疼痛史计算特定随访时的1个月疼痛患病率。
个体随访时腰痛的1个月患病率在16%至19%之间。在906名完成基线问卷和至少三份随访问卷的女性中,38名(4.2%)每次返回问卷时都报告疼痛,190名(21.0%)至少三次报告疼痛。基线时是否存在腰痛对整个随访期间未来疼痛具有高度预测性。持续报告背痛的时间越长,在下一次随访时出现背痛的可能性就越大。在基线或前两次随访中均未报告背痛的女性中,后期风险最低。如果背痛导致残疾或与坐骨神经痛相关,则预后较差。
我们的结果证实了疼痛持续时间以及相关残疾和坐骨神经痛的发生作为未来症状预测指标的重要性,并使我们能够更可靠地量化工作年龄女性腰痛的自然病程。在没有其他信息的情况下,与个人腰痛史相关的风险差异在至少2年的时间内似乎保持不变。