Chu G, Li L, Sato Y, Harrer J M, Kadambi V J, Hoit B D, Bers D M, Kranias E G
Department of Pharmacology and Cell Biophysics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45267-0575, USA.
J Biol Chem. 1998 Dec 11;273(50):33674-80. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.50.33674.
Phospholamban has been proposed to coexist as pentamers and monomers in native sarcoplasmic reticulum membranes. To determine its functional unit in vivo, we reintroduced wild-type (pentameric) or monomeric mutant (C41F) phospholamban in the hearts of phospholamban knockout mice. Transgenic lines, expressing similar levels of mutant or wild-type phospholamban, were identified, and their cardiac phenotypes were characterized in parallel. Sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ transport assays indicated similar decreases in SERCA2 Ca2+ affinity by mutant or wild-type phospholamban. However, the time constants of relaxation and Ca2+ transient decline in isolated cardiomyocytes were diminished to a greater extent by wild-type than mutant phospholamban, even without significant differences in the amplitudes of myocyte contraction and Ca2+ transients between the two groups. Langendorff perfusion also indicated that mutant phospholamban was not capable of depressing the enhanced relaxation parameters of the phospholamban knockout hearts to the same extent as wild-type phospholamban. Moreover, in vivo assessment of mouse hemodynamics revealed a greater depression of cardiac function in wild-type than mutant phospholamban hearts. Thus, the mutant or monomeric form of phospholamban was not as effective in slowing Ca2+ decline or relaxation in cardiomyocytes, hearts, or intact animals as wild-type or pentameric phospholamban. These findings suggest that pentameric assembly of phospholamban is necessary for optimal regulation of myocardial contractility in vivo.
有人提出,在天然肌浆网膜中,受磷蛋白以五聚体和单体的形式共存。为了确定其在体内的功能单位,我们将野生型(五聚体)或单体突变型(C41F)受磷蛋白重新导入受磷蛋白基因敲除小鼠的心脏。鉴定出表达相似水平的突变型或野生型受磷蛋白的转基因品系,并同时对它们的心脏表型进行了表征。肌浆网Ca2+转运试验表明,突变型或野生型受磷蛋白对肌浆网Ca2+ - ATP酶(SERCA2)的Ca2+亲和力有相似程度的降低。然而,在分离的心肌细胞中,野生型受磷蛋白比突变型受磷蛋白更能显著缩短舒张时间常数和Ca2+瞬变衰减时间,即使两组之间心肌细胞收缩幅度和Ca2+瞬变无显著差异。Langendorff灌注也表明,突变型受磷蛋白不能像野生型受磷蛋白那样将受磷蛋白基因敲除心脏增强的舒张参数抑制到相同程度。此外,对小鼠血流动力学的体内评估显示,野生型受磷蛋白心脏的心脏功能抑制程度比突变型受磷蛋白心脏更大。因此,受磷蛋白的突变型或单体形式在减缓心肌细胞、心脏或完整动物体内Ca2+衰减或舒张方面不如野生型或五聚体受磷蛋白有效。这些发现表明,受磷蛋白的五聚体组装对于体内心肌收缩力的最佳调节是必要的。