Rose S C, Kinney T B, Bundens W P, Valji K, Roberts A C
Department of Radiology, University of California Medical Center, San Diego 92103-8756, USA.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1998 Nov-Dec;9(6):927-34. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(98)70424-5.
To assess the sensitivity of Doppler flow analysis of the axillary and internal jugular veins to screen for clinically occult thoracic central veno-occlusive disease and predict successful placement of central access catheters.
Sixty-seven patients underwent both duplex sonographic evaluation of the axillary and internal jugular veins and contrast venography prior to placement of a central venous catheter. Duplex evaluation included visual evidence of veno-occlusive disease as well as the presence or absence of normal transmitted polyphasic atrial waves and respiratory variation of flow. Diagnostically adequate venograms were available for comparison with the duplex sonograms in 168 access routes (access site plus downstream conduit veins). The contrast venograms and sonograms were compared by using retrospective blinded interpretation. Outcome of attempted catheter placement was tabulated.
Directed sonographic imaging of the axillary and internal jugular vein allowed detection of access route veno-occlusive disease with a sensitivity of only 33.3%. Alternatively, when Doppler flow analysis found atrial waveforms that were not polyphasic, central conduit occlusive disease was detected with a sensitivity of 79.6%. Monophasic atrial waveforms were associated with a 25% failure rate of catheterization due to central vein occlusive disease, whereas polyphasic atrial waveforms were correlated with a 100% success rate for catheter placement.
In asymptomatic patients, sonographic imaging alone misses most instances of central veno-occlusive disease. However, Doppler flow analysis of transmitted atrial waveforms substantially improved the sensitivity. A normal polyphasic atrial waveform virtually excludes the possibility of a more central venous occlusion or stenosis greater than 80% and ensures an adequate route for central venous catheterization.
评估腋静脉和颈内静脉的多普勒血流分析对筛查临床隐匿性胸段中心静脉闭塞性疾病以及预测中心静脉导管成功置入的敏感性。
67例患者在置入中心静脉导管前,均接受了腋静脉和颈内静脉的双功超声评估以及静脉造影。双功超声评估包括静脉闭塞性疾病的可视证据,以及正常传递的多相心房波的有无和血流的呼吸变化。在168条穿刺路径(穿刺部位加下游导管静脉)中,有诊断意义的静脉造影可用于与双功超声图像进行比较。通过回顾性盲法解读对静脉造影和超声图像进行比较。将尝试置管的结果制成表格。
对腋静脉和颈内静脉进行直接超声成像检测穿刺路径静脉闭塞性疾病的敏感性仅为33.3%。另外,当多普勒血流分析发现心房波形不是多相时,检测中心导管闭塞性疾病的敏感性为79.6%。单相心房波形与因中心静脉闭塞性疾病导致的25%的置管失败率相关,而多相心房波形与100%的置管成功率相关。
在无症状患者中,仅靠超声成像会漏诊大多数中心静脉闭塞性疾病病例。然而多普勒血流分析对传递的心房波形进行分析可显著提高敏感性。正常的多相心房波形几乎排除了更中心部位静脉闭塞或狭窄超过80%的可能性,并确保了中心静脉置管的合适路径。