• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠癌局部复发的危险因素:一项多变量研究。

Risk factors of local recurrence of colorectal cancer: a multivariate study.

作者信息

Pietra N, Sarli L, Thenasseril B J, Costi R, Sansebastiano G, Peracchia A

机构信息

Institute of General Surgery, University of Parma, School of Medicine, Italy.

出版信息

Hepatogastroenterology. 1998 Sep-Oct;45(23):1573-8.

PMID:9840107
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Duke's staging is still the most widely used parameter in the estimation of risk for local recurrence in patients with colorectal neoplasia. The aim of this study is to identify biological determinants that may be of use in segregating patients with similarly staged tumors into groups with different risk of local recurrence.

METHODOLOGY

Ninety-eight patients who had undergone curative resection for colorectal cancer between 1989 and 1991 were prospectively studied. Statistical analysis of clinical and pathologic variables was carried out using a Cox multivariate proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

Dukes stage and DNA ploidy were the only significantly predictive variables for local recurrence. In particular, the factors increasing local recurrence risk were seen to be the presence of lymph node metastases and aneuploid status. In the absence of both of these negative prognostic factors the risk of local recurrence is practically nil, in the presence of just one it reaches 16% and in the presence of both it rises to over 40%.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that the presence of an aneuploid tumor with positive lymph nodes places patients at a higher risk of local recurrence, and calls for post-operative adjuvant therapy and intensive follow-up.

摘要

背景/目的:在评估结直肠肿瘤患者局部复发风险时,杜克分期仍是应用最广泛的参数。本研究旨在确定生物学决定因素,这些因素可能有助于将分期相似的肿瘤患者分为局部复发风险不同的组。

方法

对1989年至1991年间接受结直肠癌根治性切除术的98例患者进行前瞻性研究。使用Cox多变量比例风险模型对临床和病理变量进行统计分析。

结果

杜克分期和DNA倍体是局部复发的唯一显著预测变量。特别是,增加局部复发风险的因素是存在淋巴结转移和非整倍体状态。在不存在这两个不良预后因素的情况下,局部复发风险几乎为零;仅存在其中一个因素时,风险达到16%;同时存在这两个因素时,风险升至40%以上。

结论

本研究结果表明,存在伴有阳性淋巴结转移的非整倍体肿瘤会使患者局部复发风险更高,因此需要术后辅助治疗和强化随访。

相似文献

1
Risk factors of local recurrence of colorectal cancer: a multivariate study.结直肠癌局部复发的危险因素:一项多变量研究。
Hepatogastroenterology. 1998 Sep-Oct;45(23):1573-8.
2
Lymph node recovery from colorectal tumor specimens: recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be examined.结直肠肿瘤标本的淋巴结回收:关于建议检查的最少淋巴结数量
World J Surg. 2002 Mar;26(3):384-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-001-0236-8. Epub 2002 Jan 15.
3
Microsatellite instability and DNA ploidy in colorectal cancer: potential implications for patients undergoing systematic surveillance after resection.结直肠癌中的微卫星不稳定性和DNA倍性:对切除术后接受系统监测的患者的潜在影响
Cancer. 2009 Jan 15;115(2):271-82. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24024.
4
Free colorectal cancer cells on the peritoneal surface: correlation with pathologic variables and survival.腹膜表面的游离结直肠癌细胞:与病理变量及生存情况的相关性
Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Dec;47(12):2076-9. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0723-8.
5
Identification of early-stage colorectal cancer patients at risk of relapse post-resection by immunobead reverse transcription-PCR analysis of peritoneal lavage fluid for malignant cells.通过对腹腔灌洗液中的恶性细胞进行免疫磁珠逆转录 - 聚合酶链反应分析,识别切除术后有复发风险的早期结直肠癌患者。
Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Jan 15;12(2):417-23. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1473.
6
Selecting breast cancer patients with T1-T2 tumors and one to three positive axillary nodes at high postmastectomy locoregional recurrence risk for adjuvant radiotherapy.选择具有T1-T2肿瘤且腋窝淋巴结有1至3个阳性、保乳术后局部区域复发风险高的乳腺癌患者进行辅助放疗。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Apr 1;61(5):1337-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.08.009.
7
[Multivariate regression analysis of recurrence following curative surgery for colorectal cancer].[结直肠癌根治性手术后复发的多变量回归分析]
Ai Zheng. 2004 May;23(5):564-7.
8
Factors predictive of survival in patients with node-positive colorectal cancer in Taiwan.台湾地区淋巴结阳性结直肠癌患者生存的预测因素。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2000 Nov-Dec;47(36):1590-4.
9
Pathologic determinants of survival after resection of T3N0 (Stage IIA) colorectal cancer: proposal for a new prognostic model.T3N0(IIA期)结肠癌切除术后生存的病理决定因素:一种新的预后模型的建议
Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Sep;50(9):1332-41. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-0222-9.
10
Tumor invasion of lymph node capsules in patients with Dukes C colorectal adenocarcinoma.Dukes C期结肠腺癌患者的肿瘤对淋巴结被膜的侵犯
Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Dec;49(12):1867-77. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0733-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk of relapse and death from colorectal cancer and its related factors using non-Markovian Multi-State model.使用非马尔可夫多状态模型分析结直肠癌复发和死亡风险及其相关因素。
Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2020 Summer;13(3):200-208.
2
[Influence of primary lymph node status of colorectal cancer on the development of pulmonary metastases and thoracic lymph node metastases].[结直肠癌原发淋巴结状态对肺转移及胸段淋巴结转移发生的影响]
Chirurg. 2019 May;90(5):403-410. doi: 10.1007/s00104-018-0742-y.
3
Gut microbiome influences on anastomotic leak and recurrence rates following colorectal cancer surgery.
肠道微生物组对结直肠癌手术后吻合口漏和复发率的影响。
Br J Surg. 2018 Jan;105(2):e131-e141. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10760.
4
Isolated repeated anastomotic recurrence after sigmoidectomy.乙状结肠切除术后孤立性反复吻合口复发。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov 21;20(43):16343-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i43.16343.
5
Repeated anastomotic recurrence of colorectal tumors: genetic analysis of two cases.结直肠肿瘤吻合口复发的再发:两例病例的基因分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Aug 28;17(32):3752-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i32.3752.
6
Can early diagnosis of symptomatic colorectal cancer improve the prognosis?有症状的结直肠癌早期诊断能否改善预后?
World J Surg. 2004 Jul;28(7):716-20. doi: 10.1007/s00268-004-7232-8. Epub 2004 Jun 16.
7
Microsatellite-stable diploid carcinoma: a biologically distinct and aggressive subset of sporadic colorectal cancer.微卫星稳定二倍体癌:散发性结直肠癌中一个生物学特性不同且侵袭性强的亚组。
Br J Cancer. 2001 Jan;84(2):232-6. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1554.