Suppr超能文献

超声引导可减少三合一阻滞的局部麻醉药用量。

Ultrasonographic guidance reduces the amount of local anesthetic for 3-in-1 blocks.

作者信息

Marhofer P, Schrögendorfer K, Wallner T, Koinig H, Mayer N, Kapral S

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and General Intensive Care Medicine, University of Vienna, School of Medicine, Austria.

出版信息

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1998 Nov-Dec;23(6):584-8. doi: 10.1016/s1098-7339(98)90086-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Recently it has been demonstrated that the use of ultrasound (US) improves the onset time and the quality of sensory block for 3-in-1 blocks compared with conventional nerve stimulator (NS) techniques. The present study was designed to evaluate if US guidance for 3-in-1 blocks reduces the amount of local anesthetic compared to NS guidance.

METHODS

After institutional approval and informed consent, 60 patients undergoing hip surgery following trauma were randomly assigned to three groups of 20 patients each. In group A, the 3-in-1 block was performed using US guidance with 20 mL 0.5% bupivacaine. Group B received 20 mL 0.5% bupivacaine, and group C received 30 mL 0.5% bupivacaine during NS guidance. The quality and the onset time was assessed by pinprick test in the central sensory region of each of the three targeted nerves and compared with the contralateral leg every 10 minutes for 1 hour by a blinded observer. The rating was undertaken using a scale from 100% (uncompromised sensibility) to 0% (no sensation).

RESULTS

Overall success for the 3-in-1 block in group A was 95% and in groups B and C 80%. Onset time was significantly shorter in the US-guided group compared with both NS-guided groups (group A 13+/-6 minutes; group B 27+/-12 minutes; and group C 26+/-13 minutes; P < .01 to groups B and C). Quality of sensory block was significantly better in group A (4%+/-5% of initial value) compared with groups B and C (group B 21%+/-11% of initial value, P < .01 to group A; group C 22%+/-19%, P < .01 to group A).

CONCLUSION

The amount of local anesthetic for 3-in-1 blocks can be reduced by using US guidance compared with the conventional NS-guided technique.

摘要

背景与目的

最近有研究表明,与传统神经刺激器(NS)技术相比,使用超声(US)可改善三合一阻滞的起效时间和感觉阻滞质量。本研究旨在评估与NS引导相比,US引导下的三合一阻滞是否能减少局部麻醉药的用量。

方法

经机构批准并获得知情同意后,60例因创伤接受髋关节手术的患者被随机分为三组,每组20例。A组在US引导下使用20 mL 0.5%布比卡因进行三合一阻滞。B组接受20 mL 0.5%布比卡因,C组在NS引导下接受30 mL 0.5%布比卡因。由一名盲法观察者通过针刺试验在三条目标神经各自的中央感觉区域评估感觉阻滞的质量和起效时间,并每10分钟与对侧腿进行比较,持续1小时。使用从100%(感觉未受损)到0%(无感觉)的量表进行评分。

结果

A组三合一阻滞的总体成功率为95%,B组和C组为80%。与两个NS引导组相比,US引导组的起效时间明显更短(A组13±6分钟;B组27±12分钟;C组26±13分钟;与B组和C组相比,P <.01)。A组感觉阻滞质量明显优于B组和C组(为初始值的4%±5%)(B组为初始值的21%±11%,与A组相比,P <.01;C组为22%±19%,与A组相比,P <.01)。

结论

与传统NS引导技术相比,使用US引导可减少三合一阻滞的局部麻醉药用量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验