Suppr超能文献

男性作为照顾者:是互惠关系还是义务?

Men as caregivers: reciprocal relationships or obligation?

作者信息

Neufeld A, Harrison M J

机构信息

Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 1998 Nov;28(5):959-68. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00818.x.

Abstract

This study explored reciprocity in the relationships of men caregivers of cognitively impaired older adults. Reciprocity is a dimension of social support that is important in caregivers' ability to sustain supportive relationships. Equity theory predicts that inequitable (non-reciprocal) exchanges will result in termination of relationships. The objective of the study was to identify the context in which reciprocity was present or absent, the characteristics of reciprocity in caregivers' relationships with the care recipient, family and friends, and the men's feelings about reciprocal social support during caregiving. Twenty-two men caregivers were interviewed three times over 18 months. Study findings were confirmed in a focus group discussion with seven caregivers. Three variations in reciprocity in the men's relationship with the care recipient were identified: waived reciprocity, generalized reciprocity and constructed reciprocity. Those experiencing constructed or generalized reciprocity described positive feelings, whereas men identifying waived reciprocity described either positive or negative feelings. When reciprocity was absent the men described giving care on the basis of obligation with either mixed or negative feelings. Reciprocity in relationships with friends and family is also described. The study findings support the assumptions of equity theory about reciprocity; however, perceptions of obligation may be better understood in the context of the principles of justice and caring.

摘要

本研究探讨了认知障碍老年人男性照料者关系中的互惠性。互惠性是社会支持的一个维度,对于照料者维持支持性关系的能力很重要。公平理论预测,不公平(非互惠)的交换将导致关系终止。该研究的目的是确定存在或不存在互惠性的背景、照料者与受照料者、家人和朋友关系中互惠性的特征,以及男性在照料期间对互惠性社会支持的感受。22名男性照料者在18个月内接受了三次访谈。在与7名照料者进行的焦点小组讨论中证实了研究结果。在男性与受照料者的关系中确定了三种互惠性变化:放弃的互惠性、普遍的互惠性和构建的互惠性。经历构建的或普遍的互惠性的人描述了积极的感受,而确定放弃的互惠性的男性描述了积极或消极的感受。当不存在互惠性时,男性描述是基于义务给予照料,伴有复杂或消极的感受。还描述了与朋友和家人关系中的互惠性。研究结果支持了公平理论关于互惠性的假设;然而,在正义和关怀原则的背景下,对义务的认知可能会得到更好的理解。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验