Griffiths P
School of Health Science, University of Wales, College of Swansea, Trinity College Campus, Carmarthenshire.
J Adv Nurs. 1998 Nov;28(5):969-77. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00739.x.
This paper describes an investigation into how nurses describe patients' problems and the possible effects of an espoused nursing model on these descriptions. A descriptive study was conducted on two medical wards in a Welsh District General Hospital. Data collected were subjected to content analysis using Gordon's Functional Health Patterns to order the data. The two wards investigated, whilst being very similar in many ways, utilized different nursing models. Findings showed that the nurses studied, when describing patients' problems, most commonly used medical diagnoses or the medical reasons for admission. Patients' problems identified predominately addressed bio-physical needs with scant attention given to psycho-social needs. Despite the use of two different nursing models the language and emphasis of problem description were very similar and there was no evidence of the application of the conceptual underpinnings of the two models. It is suggested that although the use of a ready-made nursing language may have drawbacks, the British nurse should understand and assess the value of the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association's (NANDA) nursing diagnoses. Without such involvement this system may be implemented in the United Kingdom (UK) without the input and influence of practising nurses.
本文描述了一项关于护士如何描述患者问题以及一种既定护理模式对这些描述可能产生的影响的调查。在威尔士一家地区综合医院的两个内科病房进行了一项描述性研究。收集到的数据采用戈登的功能健康模式进行内容分析以整理数据。所调查的两个病房虽然在很多方面非常相似,但采用了不同的护理模式。研究结果表明,参与研究的护士在描述患者问题时,最常用的是医学诊断或入院的医学原因。所确定的患者问题主要涉及生物物理需求,而对心理社会需求关注甚少。尽管使用了两种不同的护理模式,但问题描述的语言和重点非常相似,且没有证据表明两种模式的概念基础得到了应用。建议尽管使用现成的护理语言可能有缺点,但英国护士应该理解并评估北美护理诊断协会(NANDA)护理诊断的价值。如果没有这种参与,该系统可能会在英国实施,而没有执业护士的投入和影响。