卫生服务研究：公共利益、个人隐私与产权利益 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Health services research: public benefits, personal privacy, and proprietary interests.

作者信息

Gostin L O, Hadley J

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 1998 Nov 15;129(10):833-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-129-10-199811150-00017.

DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-129-10-199811150-00017

PMID:9841591

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Health services research: public benefits, personal privacy, and proprietary interests.卫生服务研究：公共利益、个人隐私与产权利益

Ann Intern Med. 1998 Nov 15;129(10):833-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-129-10-199811150-00017.

Personal privacy and common goods: a framework for balancing under the national health information privacy rule.个人隐私与公共利益：国家健康信息隐私规则下的平衡框架

Minn Law Rev. 2002 Jun;86(6):1439-79.

Curing the unique health identifier: a reconciliation of new technology and privacy rights.

Jurimetrics. 2003 Winter;43(2):165-86.

Health and human services' privacy proposal: a failed attempt at health information privacy protection.卫生与公众服务部的隐私提案：保护健康信息隐私的一次失败尝试。

Brandeis Law J. 2002 Summer;40(4):1065-84.

The final patient privacy regulations under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act--promoting patient privacy or public confusion?《健康保险流通与责任法案》下的最终患者隐私规定——是促进患者隐私还是引发公众困惑？

Georgia Law Rev. 2003 Winter;37(2):723-54.

Institutional review boards and the new privacy rule.机构审查委员会与新隐私规则。

Hum Res Rep. 2001 Sep;16(9):1-3.

A tripartite threat to medical records privacy: technology, HIPAA's privacy rule and the USA Patriot Act.对医疗记录隐私的三方威胁：技术、《健康保险流通与责任法案》的隐私规则以及《美国爱国者法案》。

J Law Health. 2002;17(2):271-96.

Brave new world: the privacy threat that didn't go away.美丽新世界：未曾消除的隐私威胁。

New Repub. 1999 Jul 12;221(2):16-8.

Protection of privacy in health care reform.

Vanderbilt Law Rev. 1995 Mar;48(2):295-347.

Issues impacting health care in the new millennium: privacy, electronic medical records, and the internet.新千年影响医疗保健的问题：隐私、电子病历与互联网。

J Nurs Law. 2001 Mar;7(4):7-13.

引用本文的文献

Ethics in medical research: General principles with special reference to psychiatry research.医学研究中的伦理学：一般原则，特别参考精神病学研究。

Indian J Psychiatry. 2013 Jan;55(1):86-91. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.105525.

Application description and policy model in collaborative environment for sharing of information on epidemiological and clinical research data sets.协作环境中的应用描述和策略模型，用于共享流行病学和临床研究数据集的信息。

PLoS One. 2010 Feb 19;5(2):e9314. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009314.

Feasibility of a patient decision aid regarding disclosure of personal health information: qualitative evaluation of the Health Care Information Directive.关于个人健康信息披露的患者决策辅助工具的可行性：《医疗保健信息指令》的定性评估

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2004 Sep 10;4:13. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-4-13.

Requiring consent vs. waiving consent for medical records research: a Minnesota law vs. the U.S. (HIPAA) privacy rule.医疗记录研究中的同意要求与同意豁免：明尼苏达州法律与美国（《健康保险流通与责任法案》）隐私规则的对比

Health Care Anal. 2003 Sep;11(3):207-18. doi: 10.1023/B:HCAN.0000005493.21521.42.

The use of medical records in research: what do patients want?医学记录在研究中的使用：患者想要什么？

J Law Med Ethics. 2003 Fall;31(3):429-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2003.tb00105.x.

Health information: reconciling personal privacy with the public good of human health.健康信息：平衡个人隐私与人类健康的公共利益。

Health Care Anal. 2001;9(3):321-35. doi: 10.1023/A:1012905932744.

The privacy paradox: laying Orwell's ghost to rest.隐私悖论：让奥威尔的幽灵安息

CMAJ. 2001 Aug 7;165(3):307-9.

The health care information directive.医疗保健信息指令。

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2001;1:1. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-1-1. Epub 2001 Apr 25.

Shared expectations for protection of identifiable health care information: report of a national consensus process.保护可识别医疗保健信息的共同期望：全国共识过程报告。

J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Feb;16(2):100-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.00515.x.

'Watching' medicine: do bioethicists respect patients' privacy?“观察”医学：生物伦理学家尊重患者隐私吗？

Theor Med Bioeth. 2000 Nov;21(6):537-52. doi: 10.1023/a:1026511902210.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验