患者对查阅病历书面许可请求的回应。
Patient responses to request for written permission to review medical records.
作者信息
Neuhaus E, Lyons T F, Payne B C
出版信息
Am J Public Health. 1976 Nov;66(11):1090-2. doi: 10.2105/ajph.66.11.1090.
Abstract
2,163 patients of 55 physicians in one county, were sent letters asking for their written permission to have their medical records audited by the University of Michigan research team. The overall positive response rate was 64.1% for one county. Differences in response rates were statistically significant among specialties, among diagnoses, and among individual physicians.
摘要
一个县的55名医生的2163名患者收到了信件，信中请求他们书面许可密歇根大学研究团队审核其医疗记录。一个县的总体积极回应率为64.1%。不同专业、不同诊断以及不同个体医生之间的回应率差异具有统计学意义。
相似文献
1
Patient responses to request for written permission to review medical records.患者对查阅病历书面许可请求的回应。
Am J Public Health. 1976 Nov;66(11):1090-2. doi: 10.2105/ajph.66.11.1090.
2
Some POMR criticism clearly misdirected.一些以问题为导向的医疗记录批评显然指向错误。
Hospitals. 1975 Apr 16;49(8):58-61.
3
Access to medical records for the purposes of medical audit.为医疗审计目的获取病历。
BMJ. 1993 Apr 3;306(6882):896-7.
4
5
Use of personal records for research purposes. Guidelines may affect audit.将个人记录用于研究目的。指导方针可能会影响审计。
BMJ. 1995 Jan 28;310(6974):258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6974.258b.
6
7
Importance and limits of medical confidentiality.
Health Law Can. 1997 Feb;17(3):93-5.
8
Medicaid audit: crisis in confidentiality and the patient-psychiatrist relationship.医疗补助审计：保密危机与医患关系
Am J Psychiatry. 1979 Apr;136(4A):447-50.
9
[Examination of factors for promoting cooperation using documents between occupational health physicians and psychiatrists].[利用职业健康医生与精神科医生之间的文件探讨促进合作的因素]
Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2018 Feb 1;60(1):1-14. doi: 10.1539/sangyoeisei.17-009-E. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
10
Adjusted Clinical Groups (ACGs) explain the utilization of primary care in Spain based on information registered in the medical records: a cross-sectional study.调整后的临床分组（ACGs）基于病历中记录的信息解释了西班牙初级保健的利用情况：一项横断面研究。
Health Policy. 2006 Mar;76(1):38-48. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.04.005. Epub 2005 Jun 8.
引用本文的文献
1
Method of evaluating and improving ambulatory medical care.评估与改善门诊医疗的方法。
Health Serv Res. 1984 Jun;19(2):219-45.
2
Privacy, research, and the health of the public.隐私、研究与公众健康。
Am J Public Health. 1976 Nov;66(11):1050-1. doi: 10.2105/ajph.66.11.1050.
本文引用的文献
1
The AAFP-UNC study of the organization, utilization, and assessment of primary medical care.美国家庭医师学会-北卡罗来纳大学关于初级医疗保健的组织、利用和评估的研究。
Am J Public Health. 1973 Jun;63(6):494-501. doi: 10.2105/ajph.63.6.494.
Zotero 插件