Wesche J, Elliott J L, Falnes P O, Olsnes S, Collier R J
Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Biochemistry. 1998 Nov 10;37(45):15737-46. doi: 10.1021/bi981436i.
Solving the crystallographic structure of the ring-shaped heptamer formed by protective antigen (PA), the B moiety of anthrax toxin, has focused attention on understanding how this oligomer mediates membrane translocation of the toxin's A moieties. We have developed an assay for translocation in which radiolabeled ligands are bound to proteolytically activated PA (PA63) at the surface of CHO or L6 cells, and translocation across the plasma membrane is induced by lowering the pH. The cells are then treated with Pronase E to degrade residual surface-bound material, and protected ligands are quantified after fractionation by SDS-PAGE. Translocation was most efficient (35%-50%) with LFN, the N-terminal PA binding domain of the anthrax lethal factor (LF). Intact LF, edema factor (EF), or fusion proteins containing LFN fused to certain heterologous proteins [the diphtheria toxin A chain (DTA) or dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR)] were less efficiently translocated (15%-20%); and LFN fusions to several other proteins were not translocated at all. LFN with different N-terminal residues was found to be degraded according to the N-end rule by the proteasome, and translocation of LFN fused to a mutant form of DHFR with a low affinity for methotrexate (MTX) protected cells from the effects of MTX. Both results are consistent with a cytosolic location of protected proteins. Evidence that a protein must unfold to be translocated was obtained in experiments showing that (i) translocation of LFNDTA was blocked by introduction of an artificial disulfide into the DTA moiety, and (ii) translocation of LFNDHFR and LFNDTA was blocked by their ligands (MTX and adenine, respectively). These results demonstrate that the acid-induced translocation by anthrax toxin closely resembles that of diphtheria toxin, despite the fact that these two toxins are unrelated and form pores by different mechanisms.
炭疽毒素的B部分即保护性抗原(PA)形成的环状七聚体的晶体结构解析,使人们将注意力集中在理解这种寡聚体如何介导毒素A部分的膜转运上。我们开发了一种转运分析方法,其中放射性标记的配体与CHO或L6细胞表面经蛋白酶激活的PA(PA63)结合,通过降低pH诱导其跨质膜转运。然后用链霉蛋白酶E处理细胞以降解残留的表面结合物质,经SDS-PAGE分级分离后对受保护的配体进行定量。炭疽致死因子(LF)的N端PA结合结构域LFN的转运效率最高(35%-50%)。完整的LF、水肿因子(EF)或含有与某些异源蛋白融合的LFN的融合蛋白[白喉毒素A链(DTA)或二氢叶酸还原酶(DHFR)]的转运效率较低(15%-20%);而LFN与其他几种蛋白的融合体根本不发生转运。发现具有不同N端残基的LFN根据N端规则被蛋白酶体降解,与甲氨蝶呤(MTX)亲和力低的DHFR突变体形式融合的LFN的转运保护细胞免受MTX的影响。这两个结果都与受保护蛋白位于胞质溶胶一致。在实验中获得了蛋白质必须展开才能转运的证据,实验表明:(i)通过在DTA部分引入人工二硫键阻断了LFNDTA的转运,(ii)LFNDHFR和LFNDTA的转运分别被其配体(MTX和腺嘌呤)阻断。这些结果表明,尽管这两种毒素无关且通过不同机制形成孔道,但炭疽毒素酸诱导的转运与白喉毒素的转运非常相似。